Laserfiche WebLink
V k.fe..V,av; •' <br />M^- ■ ■ <br />ms.; <br />^ rr-i; <br />“t*- V. <br />r--K <br />V" <br />13'.'’*.'“'pr. vJi/' <br />■ <br />u. . <br />fA ■m-'- <br />fe <br />mA'A.' <br />y, <br />i^\:liir--^ <br />: .?:>?.■■ -Vrr •' <br />I <br />-V •- <br />:ir. <br />%yt <br />5. <br />A.The existing detached garage within the street <br />yard does not meet the street setback standard of <br />10' and is located approximately 2' from the curve <br />adjacent to the public roadway. <br />B.The detached garage in this area does not confoon <br />to current development pattern for homes within <br />this neighborhood. <br />C.There is no hardcover within the 0-75* setback <br />area. <br />D.The proposed addition and second story bedroom <br />expansion will not encroach the average lakeshore <br />setb^ rk line. <br />E.The neighbor receiving the most impact from the <br />proposed construction has provided a written <br />statement approving of the application. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br />this property are peculiar to it and do not apply <br />generally to other property in this zoning district? <br />that granting the variances would not adversely affect <br />traffic conditions^ lights air nor pose a fire hazard <br />or other danger to neighboring property? would not <br />merely serve as a convenience to the applicantr but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or <br />difficulty? is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants? and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br />and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application <br />including the findings and recommendations of the <br />Planning Commission# reports by City staff# comments by <br />the applicants and the effect of the variances on the <br />health# safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />■i <br />y <br />•i <br />P. <br />•fi <br />4