My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
05-11-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2024 1:24:27 PM
Creation date
3/19/2024 1:22:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fOP tUE ORONO COUNCIL HEETING HELD TEBRUARY 11 , 1985. PAGE 5 <br />^S'S'k-'. \ <br />■■ <br />I? > <br />,:'c . <br />V '.r <br />»r <br />#L'ja <br />..iv <br />ii;miH <br />ifcSov;.'' <br />mM <br />fc.' <br />Councilmemb«r Frahn and T. Adams asked that a compromise be <br />reached maybe by extending only 10 percent into the 0-75' <br />zone and placing decking on the side. They felt that the 20 <br />percent variance was too much to allow and that a 10 percent <br />variance would be better. <br />David Kirscht stated that from a design and function <br />standpoint it would not be feasible. <br />Mayor Butler withdrew the motion <br />CounciImember L. Adams stated that he would amend his second <br />U Biot ion was made for a 10 percent variance rather than 20 <br />percent. <br />Councilmeraber Grabek explained that if the City was going to <br />give the applicant a 10 percent variance, they may as well <br />give him the 20 percent variance. Grabek stated that by <br />giving the applicant only 10 percent it doesn ’ t make the deck <br />very desireable or useable; therefore, the City should be <br />strict and consistent and not allow any structure within the <br />0-75' *one. Grabek noted if the City's philosophy is going <br />to change and allow structures within that 0-75’ zone, what <br />is the difference between lC-20 ' . Grabek noted the City may <br />as well let the applicant have the 20 percent if they are going <br />to change their philosophy. Grabek asked the Council why <br />penalize the applicant 10' just so the Council feels safer <br />that they are staying within the 75' setback. <br />Hichard Pagatz agreed with Counci li<iember Grabex in that if <br />the City only approved a 10 percent variance the deck would <br />not be as functional. <br />Mayor Butler suggested that Council pick a number to give the <br />applicant guidelines on redesigning his deck. <br />Councilmember Grabek stated that puts the Council in an <br />awkward position in that it makes someone pull out of the air a <br />number that they feel appropriate without any basic sound <br />engineering judgment or any science of decking, or movement <br />of people, and opening of windows or doors. <br />Councilmember Grabek moved. Mayor Butler seconded, to <br />approve the setback variance for Richard Ragatz to coistruct <br />the proposed deck and direct staff to draft a resolution of <br />approval incorporating all of the findings and conditions <br />made in Mayor Butler’s previous motion. Motion, Ayes (4J, <br />Mays (1). <br />Councilmember Tim Adams voted nay. <br />Councilmember L. Adams asked why Councilmember Grabek <br />changed his opinion. <br />3 <br />I <br />ijuL
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.