Laserfiche WebLink
K’.IA - fis- • <br />.1 <br />i. <br />S3 fWi3 r -«^r ^^n^1 <br />City of OP <br />I ’ » <br />H«S0LUT!0N 0* TNf Ci <br />NO. ___ <br />OMONO <br />k M <br />7. The local icn of . s • <br />pioblem in locjt;rq .. awiiaP-v dc.-«^. <br />I. Appl leant ho* fl-ln: t^.it hi. r.-c <br />feet of cxiJtinf) h. *. rilcivir .» <br />zone. <br />f. The front )ino of the pror^i*et? tU c <br />beyond the front line of t^c hc;Tc to <br />10. Sen(^ is to be placed jndcr the surf <br />was done in the Kruixip application (Pcsci <br />prevent encroachncni of harJcoNcr into <br />zone* hence no hardcover vjr:a'tc is rccuj <br />11. The deck low tc <br />noticeable from the lake. <br />o 1 c J n i! <br />12. A deck on either title o' the house <br />bo practical tccauM of Jimitod <br />13* The steep grade of lake startirg at <br />and the average setback of the houses i <br />appears to be SO-60* rather tna.n tre requ <br />that the natural ncn-cncroarhrr.cnt area js <br />14. The 15* elevation and stt^p slope %. <br />overlard run-off distance of 75* from th <br />7C* horisontal distance. <br />15. The variance will not eodify the <br />neighborhood. <br />11. The proposed deck etill eects the mu <br />of hetural hesourcos 50* einimum aetb <br />Oevolopeient lakes such as Lake Minnetonka. <br />17. The City Council has coneidered ^ <br />including the findings and recomwendationi <br />CoeMiieeion« reports by City staff* coeeonts <br />rnd the effect of the proposed varianct <br />safety and welfare of the community. <br />1 ••pOQO 3 of S <br />ini <1