My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
05-11-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2024 1:24:27 PM
Creation date
3/19/2024 1:22:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
---------r <br />PF’4' <br />fe-:" <br />^fi"'P- <br />ite <br />- >■ ' <br />iP <br />M^fmpv Vfc?'^ <br />■ ■■ <br />iis;.^'mBP. <br />Rti%/ ■ <br />^0'- <br />Pmx ■ ■m V." <br />Mir^■ffifei.P»'li^.tev^.fcsv wm-:WA <br />. / <br />#1:.. <br />iiife«i.^W-vip|v' <br />WiP : <br />yj'^l^iJ-' i ' ■; . \ -A .p- <br />5illMf-'|#^P <br />5, <br />The Orono Plan-.iing Commission reviewed this application on <br />February 18, 1992 and April 20, 1992, and recommended <br />approval of the variances as amended based upon the <br />following findings: <br />a)The 15' high lakeside banks shield the proposed deck <br />from the views at lakeshore. <br />The lakeside deck will not encroach the average <br />lakeshore setback determined by the closest projections <br />of the decks on the adjacent properties. <br />Location of view windows of applicant's residence, <br />location of mature trees within the side and lakeshore <br />yard and location of a house to the immediate south are <br />factors which limit the locating of deck on this <br />property . <br />The proposed deck will meet the Minnesota Department of <br />Resources 50* minxmum setback for general <br />development lake such as Lake Minnetonka. <br />e)Proposed detached garage shall encroach no closer <br />within substandard street or side setbacks of current <br />garage. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br />other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br />variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br />light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br />a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br />would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br />Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br />reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the <br />effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />I <br />■I <br />4 <br />I <br />■(! <br />] <br />i <br />■%I <br />I1 <br />i <br />. li*.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.