Laserfiche WebLink
»- V-I <br />i.PS <br />Zoning File #1714 <br />May 5, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />1^. <br />(*» <br />!v:- <br />I : ^ <br />I' <br />Hardcover within the 75-250' setback area = 8,737 5 s f <br />Allowed = 2,184.3 s.f. or 251 • ^ . i:. <br />Existing = 2,205.7 s.f. or 25.2% <br />x ’roposed =■ 2,799.34 s.f. or 32% (This includes expanded <br />paved area to provide backing out capabilitiei in street <br />172 s.f., and increase of 195 s.f. of deck area now <br />located within the 75-250' setback area) <br />6. Lot coverage facts. <br />Iv <br />y,fc..k»f- <br />.' ■ <br />r-'-V- <br />p/- <br />it- ■ <br />0 <br />aft' <br />¥ <br />fy ■ <br />:r <br />Total lot area * 14,362.:? s.f. <br />Allowed structural coverage = 2,154.4 s.f <br />Proposed = 1,822.3 s.f. or 12.6% <br />or 15% <br />'p'. <br />List of Exhibits - <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Original Proposal <br />E — Amended Proposal <br />P - Floor Plan Amended Deck <br />G - Deck Elevation <br />“ ” i through 2 Garage Elevation <br />^ ~ Garage Foundation Plans <br />J - 1 through 2 Site Plan for Application #886 and <br />Resolution #1730 <br />K - Council Minutes 2/25/85 - Approval of Application #886 <br />L - Hardcover - Existing <br />M - Hardcover - Proposed <br />N - Original Survey of Property 5/75 <br />'ft.-V" <br />J <br />V Description of Request <br />'fv <br />variance application his been rt:viewed at two meetings of the <br />Planning Commission in Februari- and April of this year. The origiii^al <br />*PPlicat-on involved a more intense encroachment of the lakeshore <br />nrea which was discouraged by the Planning Commission at the <br />amended proposal shows a reduction in hardcover <br />setback area (Original 129 s.f. has been amended to <br />1 u *4*5* ^^® reduced from 65' to 72'. A majority of the <br />laiceside deck has now been located in the 75-250* setback area <br />4 ^ increase in hardcover within the 75-250' area <br />(Original proposal at 31%; Amended proposal at 32%). <br />lo^® detached garage at 22'x26* shall replace an existing <br />20 xl8 garage located 3'8" from the street lot line and 3'9" from <br />proposes construction at the same <br />substandard setbacks. Applicant's hardcover facts show backout depth <br />u 16 . Staff has recommend-d that adequate turnaround be <br />provided by expanding paved area 4* to the north and to the west <br />f <br />V •