Laserfiche WebLink
J, <br />M0.‘i <br />, ■ <br />;P * ^ .V <br />-'; '• <br />w:' -r^.- ^ ; <br />• > -.*; i " <br />• ^ 'S’I,. -,v.v ■ <br />V' <br />S-' : <br />■;. <br />^^'v: <br />LHK' <br />^ V'^tA <br />Mm . <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 20, 199? <br />ZONING FILE #1726 - CONT. <br />It WAS Hiovsd by Schroeder, sACondsd by Peterson, to recommend <br />Approval of AppllCAtlon #1726 for Barbara and James Olexe of 995 <br />Wlldhurst Trail, for side setback and hardcover variances to <br />construct an addition to the existing residence, subject to the <br />re#K>vAl of the existing detached garage and all plastic under rock <br />be removed on the p-'operty. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />(•9) 91728 MOLLY AMO DRAPER JAFFRAY, <br />640 BARRETT AVENUE - VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:10 P.M. <br />The AffIdavIt of Pub I I cat I on and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Molly and Draper Jeffrey were present. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicants are proposing a three story <br />Addition which requires a street setback variance of 25*. The <br />existing residence Is 12’ from the right-of-way. The proposed <br />Addition wliI be 25’ from the right-of-way where a 50’ setback is <br />required. She noted the garage to be located at the lower level, <br />the family room on the first floor, and a bedroom on the second <br />floor. Access to the garage will be gained through the alley to <br />the east, and the applicants will stilt mairttain access onto <br />Barrett Avenue. <br />Rowiette asked the Intentions for the existing garage and felt It <br />could be in a hazardous condition. <br />Mr. Jaffray stated that they would liKo to leave the garage for <br />storage, and In the future they may either repair it or remove It. <br />Cohen asked If the City has ordinances requiring the maintenance <br />of such structures. <br />Mabusth stated that there Is not specific standards for maintenance <br />Qf Structures, but If a bul iding is found to be hazardous, then <br />the City can proceed with legal action. She stated the rear wail <br />of the garage Is pushed out because of pressure from the hill. She <br />noted that If the building were removed, the owner would need to <br />Install some type of retaining wall. If the structure were to be <br />rebuilt, it would require variance approval. <br />Jaffray understood staff recommendation to remove <br />garage and felt that would be reasonable. <br />the existing <br />Peterson asksd if the garage could be allowed to <br />completion of the new garage. <br />remain until <br />a <br />li!.'. ■ <br />■\ <br />I <br />A <br />*) <br />*'