My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
05-11-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2024 1:24:27 PM
Creation date
3/19/2024 1:22:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
h <br />,i-r <br />Is <br />rf' <br />^ r\ <br />i- ’ <br />': ?- ■ <br />1- v-?''?v''- V-'rS:yr']i <br />■. : ■ } ~ <br />f r:--- <br />'i ";1 ;■•:''i '' <br />\ . .■.r,r-. <br />s*:;’: '^r <br />fc. <br />-■''V" <br />■J !' <br />If <br />" ■ <br />■■ifM <br />Ni"fe <br />tot Jeanne A. Mabuath, Zoning Administrator <br />Stephen weckman, On-Site Systems Manager <br />Oat«t April 14, 1992 <br />8ab^«ets Subdivision #1730, Gregg D. Malik - Septic Review <br />I have reviewed the existing and proposed septic system <br />information for this property and would make the following <br />mts. <br />LOT 1 <br />Soil testing and design has been completed for a five <br />bedroom home. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites are <br />mounds and meet all setbacks. The alternate mound site, however, <br />is on a 7% slope which requies a variance from the septic code <br />end an interceptor drain is recommended to divert up-slope <br />drainage. The soil testing and system design have been approved <br />for both sites. <br />LOT 2 <br />The existing septic system consists of two septic tanks with <br />unknown volume and a small drainfield also of unknown size. The <br />septic system was inspected on April 13, 1992 with the septic <br />report indicating that the drainfield was saturated and <br />discharging slightly to the surface and the septic tanks required <br />pumping. The sys’-em is not considered to be failing at this <br />time# ho%rever it has a high potential for future failure. <br />Soil testing and septic design have been completed for this <br />lot indicating primary and alternate drainfield sites for a new <br />five bedroom residence. Both septic sites for Lot 2 have been <br />eonditionally approved if the two existing wells in this parcel <br />are abandoned. An old well currently not in use must be properly <br />abandoned now and the «rell serving the existing residence must be <br />abandoned prior to the issuance of a building permit. <br />'V <br />■ -h <br />it' <br />Access to Lot 1 via Outlet A encroaches over a large portion <br />of the existing drainfield. When the access road is constructed <br />through Outlot A# the existing septic system must be abandoned. <br />The existing residence may be occupied if soil testing is <br />approved indicating two available septic sites for the existing <br />residence. <br />r <br />A-; <br />SOMMAIiy <br />- r. ' <br />Based on the above information, I would recommend approval <br />of the proposed subdivision provided that the existing septic <br />system in Lot 2 be abandoned when the access road Outlot A is <br />constructed and that both existing wells in Lot 2 be abandoned <br />prior to the issuance of a building permit for Lot 2. <br />a 1 <br />■:? <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.