Laserfiche WebLink
■WSoning Pil* #1728 April IS, 1992 Pag* 2Papcriptlaa of Aaggaaf:j*r:'-. <br />► ? <br />hi-’ • h -Si- <br />s'-- .:.;■•■ <br />: ■ ■ • , <br />k '■ ■ <br />m <br />.,‘5-i. <br />Applicants propose a 20* x 22* addition to the north side of <br />the existing residence. The addition will be two and one~half <br />h stories. The first level will be a cwo-stall garage. As of this <br />I wri^ ng the City has not received revised floor plans for <br />% addx*^ion. Applicants had originally proposed a detached garage <br />and vacation of Barrett Avenue. with the filing of the <br />application, applicants have withdrawn the vacation and have <br />proceeded with an addition to the existing residence (review <br />■xhibit I). Applicants have been ashed to subsiit floor plans for <br />iBSnded proposal. The plan will be included in your final packet <br />or presentsid by applicant at your meeting. <br />As already noted above, lot coverage standards have been <br />based on the six lot area totaling 38,700 s.f. This is an RR**1B <br />soning district requiring two acres in area for each residential <br />unit. The property is served with se%rer. <br />Major access to the property will remain via Barrett Avenue <br />but access to the proposed garage will be via the 12* alley to <br />the east side, review Exhibit H. Because of the steep <br />typographic lisdtation to insMdiate north of residence, the City <br />will ask for detailed grading and drainage plans with the formal <br />subadssion of building plans for addition. Applicants have not <br />advised as to the future status of the existing garage adjacent <br />to alley. This structure is in serious disrepair and applicants <br />should be questioned as to whether it shall be removed with this <br />proposed construction. 7t appears to currently be used for <br />storage. Mote structure does not have doors. Although Barrett <br />Avenue and alley function as private driveways, the City does <br />maintain both Barrett Avenue and alley. It is staff's <br />that the alley is maintained at least up to the <br />M existing garage on the Jeffrey property. <br />Review Exhibit B. The sewer "as-built” shows a sewer line <br />nuuiing along the south lot line of Lot 16. The City Attorney's <br />office has been asked to determine if the City has received an <br />easement for this area of the project. If an easement has not <br />been granted, the applicants will be asked to grant access and <br />utility easement along the southern lot line of Lot 16. <br />■ardsblp Stat< <br />Please review Exhibit A. <br />•4 <br />r;-.: <br />;a'=- * .TU . <br />■'.Sr <br />k <br />i.1