|
rt'■ ! .f
<br />■s
<br />if.
<br />K-Va'-
<br />r
<br />fc'<
<br />%
<br />MINUTES OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING
<br />HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCI I ON
<br />HELD MAY 4, 1992
<br />3, There are a number of properties that would benefit from the
<br />reconstruction of the roadway in front of their property.
<br />4. It was determined that this Is an accepted level of assessment
<br />for the area. He explained a sheet on past assessments which
<br />Included original project costs and current connection charges for
<br />the area.
<br />Moorse explained that some le«o quantifiable factors included the
<br />number of septic problems in the area, the ability to expand the
<br />home with sewer available, and sewer vs. septic for resale. He
<br />stated the proposed assessment is based on a 15 year period at 8%
<br />interest. Property owners could prepay the assessment interest
<br />free.
<br />Mayor Peterson called for public comments.
<br />Michael Knight, representative of a number of people, which have
<br />submitted a notice of objection to the assessment, which Include
<br />the following: Stephen Whitman, David Ilse, Joseph DeMeo, Jeff
<br />DennI son and JanneII Sheriff, Albert Nelson, Loren Klitzke, Gay
<br />KeI ley, Melvin Peterson, Ernie Robins, Jeff Bartlet, Herbert Olson,
<br />Thomas Ritter, Carl Rhame, Jerry Ha!I, Brian Ahalt, Michael
<br />McLaughlin, Louise Belomy, Harlan Stockton, Pat Crane, Bill
<br />Levering, Lee Blermus, Henry Fuchner, Catherine Anderson, John
<br />McCoy, Harold Panuska, Joe Fisher, Donald Currier, Diane Ketke,
<br />Paul Vltko, Gregory Ehalt, Margaret Reusing, Hakan Andersson,
<br />Arthur Bloemendaal, Dennis Anderson, Calvin Presbyterian Church,
<br />Ron Forman, Robert Provo, Eugene Deterling, Dean Moline, James
<br />Lewis Brownlee, James St. Lawrence, and Michael Dale. He stated
<br />the main grievance his clients have is that they were not a part
<br />of the advisory committee to study the project. He proposed that
<br />Council expand the committee to represent all owners affected by
<br />the project. He suggested Council table the vote to allow
<br />representatI on of al I residents on this project In meet and discuss
<br />their concerns with the project and come forward with a workable
<br />solution.
<br />Don Gronb^ro. 65 North Willow Dr i ve . to _dlJCu.§.S-J3L!:PPSr tY.Al—115
<br />Leaf Street, stated he would like to appeal his proposed assessment
<br />of $18,880 as he felt It is not fair. He noted he has called the
<br />PCA and Dave Gustophson of the U. of M. Extension Services to
<br />obtaIn guidelines for benefits and was told that the benefit of the
<br />project would be greater for properties that are sub-standard or
<br />that have holding tanks.
<br />3
|