My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
04-27-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2024 9:16:54 AM
Creation date
3/15/2024 9:14:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fe^'fL. <br />l-^' <br />&I <br />r <br />Ik <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 13, 1992 <br />(#13) STUBBS BAY SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - <br />ASSESSMENT ROLL - <br />RESOLUTIONS #3109 & #3110 <br />Moorse explained that the Counci I ts requested to adopt two <br />resolutions, one to establish the public nearing for the Stubbs Bay <br />sanitary sewer project, and the second to adopt a proposed <br />assessment roll to be sent out to the affected property owners. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution #3109 establishing the public hearing date be set for <br />May 4, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. at the Orono Cafeteria for the proposed <br />assessment for the Stubbs Bay area sanitary sewer. Ayes 5, nays <br />0. <br />Rowlette asked what the time table was after that hearing. <br />Moorse explained that after the hearing there was a 30 day appeal <br />period. He stated they expect to begin work mid-summer. <br />Butler stated that she received a call requesting that the Council <br />consider assessing less than the total assessment per unit price. <br />Callahan stated that if it were one individual they were <br />considering. It might be feasible to reduce the average slightly <br />lower to further reduce some of the assessments. He suggested that <br />the numbers In the resolution be raised to allow for flexibility. <br />Jabbour clarified that the numbers In the resolution <br />reflect a contingency. <br />a I ready <br />Callahan suggested that the figures should be increased so the <br />Council Is not locked Into a number that is too low in the event <br />the project needs to be revised. <br />Jabbour felt that a notice should be sent with the resolution to <br />the home owners explaining how the Counci I arrived at the figures. <br />Gaffron passed out a copy of the proposed letter to be sent out <br />with the resolution. He also informed the Council that a property <br />owner on Westlake Street has indicated an ability to combine his <br />two parcels to create one, therefore he would be assessed for only <br />one unit, but this would not take place until fall 1992. <br />11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.