My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1992
>
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2024 10:27:16 AM
Creation date
3/12/2024 10:23:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />M.v <br />6- <br />$ <br />i.f t, <br />h. <br />il-. <br />■> <br />" ■ <br />r <br />r>.' <br />!:S <br />? <br />Ir <br />■■ <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 13, 1992 <br />(«9) #1722 HOWARD EISINGER, <br />3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - <br />RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - <br />RESOLUTION #3108 <br />Mr. Eisinger was present. <br />Moorse explained that this is an application for renewal of a <br />conditional use permit to allow grading and filling of 100,000 <br />cubic yards on a 12 acre site. Staff has recommended approval be <br />limited to 10,000 cubic yards. <br />Eisinger requested that Council reconsider the restrictions <br />setforth limiting the time of hauling. <br />Rowlette explained that the Planning Commission was very concerned <br />with trucks being allowed to haul during rush hour times. <br />Mayor Peterson felt they should uphold the hauling schedule <br />originally approved. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution #3108 for Application #1722 for Howard Eisinger of 3245 <br />Wayzata Boulevard, approving a renewal of a conditional use permit <br />to allow grading and filling. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#10) SHORELAND ORDINANCE RESPONSE FROM DNR <br />Gaffron explained that the DNR has responded to the shoroland <br />regulations submitted to them. The DNR would like the City to <br />justify the 18* steep slope versus their 12* and noted they would <br />need to review the code for Justification and absent that, may <br />consider changing the percentage. He stated the DNR would I ike the <br />City to require a 10’ setback for lockboxes. <br />Butler stated that many times that is not possible. <br />Callahan suggested that they propose the wording to reflect 10’ or <br />as far back as possible. <br />Gaffron stated he would inform the DNR of the Council’s views on <br />this issue. <br />Gaffron went on to state that he attended a meeting last Thursday <br />of the LMCD’s Shoreland Technical Review Committee at which <br />approximately half of the cities were represented. He stated that <br />the 11 cities working through the LMCD as a group appear to be <br />(•'rafting Individual ordinances rather than a single ordinance as <br />a group. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.