Laserfiche WebLink
5.’ 'h <br />[•; ■- <br />m- <br />M <br />iin. <br />% <br />t: <br />|r'> <br />•m:- <br />r'. <br />K <br />|- <br />i?' <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 13, 1992 <br />(#4) #1521 STEPHEN LOMBARDOZZI, <br />115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - <br />REQUEST TO EXTEND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - <br />RESOLUTION #3105 <br />Stephen LombardczzI was present. <br />Moorse explained that the applicant is requesting an extension of <br />preliminary subdivision as he was out of the Country at the time <br />the approval had expired. <br />Mabusth noted that there Is one change, the expired resolution was <br />approved under the former park dedication fee ordinance. <br />Cal Iahan directed staff tc recommend a pol icy concerning these <br />extensions as there may be many more due to the changes going on <br />within the Clty. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to aJopt Resolution <br />#3105 approving a request for an extension of preliminary <br />subdivision for one year for #1521 Stephen LombardozzI of 115 Old <br />Crystal Bay Road North. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#5) #1632 FULLERTON PROPERTIES INC., <br />2226 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - <br />REQUEST TO AMEND COVENANTS <br />Moorse explained that the applicant had requested an amendment to <br />the covenants previously but had been informed that he would need <br />the approval of the other owners within the subdivision. That has <br />been obtained. He stated that the owner has already combined Outlot <br />A with his property so that can be removed from the covenants, and <br />the owner is requesting that Council consider Outlot B be allowed <br />to be split In half and given to adjacent owners If it Is <br />determined that the roadway is not needed in the future. <br />Mabusth clarified that the owner is requesting that the southern <br />Outlot B be divided in half and fee ownership transferred to <br />property owners to east and west of road outlot If the City <br />determines It unnecessary to maintain for future roadway. She <br />stated that there Is no reason to give up the easement at this <br />time, and at the time the City should agree to such, the owners <br />would file a lot line rearrangement to divide the outlot. <br />It was moved by <br />-indment to the <br />/ s 5, nays 0. <br />Jabbour, seconded by Butler, to approve the <br />covenants of the Shadowood plat as presented.