Laserfiche WebLink
VtS''''‘'-V*‘ 'feI <br />Us <br />r'fe;* <br />lf^-fe"P <br />^i: <br />H:/' <br />hm <br />i:v' ■''' ■. '! '. <br />t>.a.■'W' <br />.iP? <br />’■a:k5-,c;. <br />','V. <br />■ V* ■' <br />- V <br />tfr-'. <br />®''' ^V"m <br />h <br />p I'.. <br />y - <br />r^,J L‘' /i! P ? <br />MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1992 <br />CLIFF OTTEN SUBDIVISION - CONT. <br />Chair Flint noted that during consideration of tne McCuIIey Road <br />property, an easement was requested for a future T-ke trail to <br />connect to County Road 6. He explained to Otten that it was hoped <br />that the trai I proposed to connect Baker Park to the Luce Line <br />could be developed through property owned by Otten direct:y north <br />of Old Crystal Bay Road North. <br />Otten commented that his wife is opposed to muiti-use trai Is as she <br />feels they do not work. They also feel that pubiic traiIs should <br />be I ocated near highways to allow accessibility of emergency <br />vehicles to the trail. <br />Otten noted there are currently three existing lots as there are <br />three different tax parcels. Me stated that the subdivision <br />process Is used at this time to facilitate the lot l;ne <br />rearrangement. Otten reviewed that the original subdivision <br />request only involved Parcel B and C and has been granted <br />preliminary approval, but he had decided to hold up the process to <br />Incorporate Parcel A. <br />Johnston suggested that the Planning Commission and Counci I be made <br />aware that the Commission was given no advance warninq of the need <br />to decide on this application. <br />Johnston pointed out that at the <br />questioned whether the City had the right to request <br />portion of land through the park dedication process. <br />ast Council meeting, they <br />a specifIc <br />Gerhardson felt it was a matter of negotiation. <br />Johnston stated that most other cities dictate the portion of land <br />they wish to receive and would have taken the bike trai I on tht <br />Otten property. <br />Chair Flint clarified that Otten really is dividing the 2+ <br />parcel with the existing residence from a larger parcel and <br />therefore it Is a subdivision. <br />Gerhardson questioned that if park dedication is requested at this <br />time, how Is it limiting future Commissions.