Laserfiche WebLink
■h' <br />^u-.;^--r <br />MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1992 <br />OBA USE OF BEDERWOOD PARK - CONT. <br />Gary Larson, OBA represen‘‘'at i ve , <br />since the last Commission meeti <br />association to relocate the arena <br />approval. The hockey associati <br />acjditional $20,000 in grading. <br />Orono schools, contacted him and <br />the arena to be located on the s <br />which was the original plan. He <br />in grading costs for the ball <br />Gerhardson would be meeting with <br />price for the work. <br />was present. He indicated that <br />ng, the proposal for the hockey <br />further westward had not met with <br />on felt the move would cost an <br />Larson stated that Neil Lawson, <br />indicated the School Board wished <br />ite as far eastward as possible, <br />felt tnere would be an increase <br />fields, and noted that he and <br />the contractor to obtain a base <br />Johnston noted he had. attended the joint meeting of the park <br />commissions and felt frustrated and angry upon leaving, <br />the hoi'key association was unwilling to work with <br />organizations on any part of the plan and felt the <br />supplied by the hockey association's architect may <br />misleading. He felt the cost of grading for the ball <br />be expensive, and noted the fields wi I I be confined to 200’ depth, <br />which are adequate for little league but inadequate for any other <br />league play. He noted that he would not be wi I Iing to spend City <br />funds on ball fields with only one use. <br />He stated <br />the other <br />information <br />have been <br />parks will <br />Vongries asked why the School Board felt the arena should be <br />located eastward. He felt it should be determined what the best <br />use of the property is and most affordable way to use the property. <br />Johnston explained that with the ball fields in the original site, <br />there was no room for expansion of the fields. He also noted that <br />the hockey association cited poor so i Is as the reason for the <br />rejection of the plan. The unacceptable fill is 3’ in the <br />southwest corner of the proposed arena. He noted that with the <br />hockey association’s plan, the ball fields would be developed on <br />property the School District currently has not purchased. <br />Larson noted that Lawson stated that would not be a problem. <br />Bradley suggested that the hockey association get the Planning <br />Commission’s opinion of their proposal. He stated the Commission <br />may not approve of such use so near the residential property. <br />Gerhardson noted he would set up a meeting between a representative <br />of the hockey association. Planning Commission Chair Kelley, Chair <br />Flint, Johnston and Gerhardson to discuss the proposal. <br />Ilse suggested they include the tiockey association’s architect