My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2024 10:27:16 AM
Creation date
3/12/2024 10:23:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'■I *'■' <br />ipix'v • <br />•V^VV't/'-;.'iv-^v <br />i?-^r <br />fS.P ■ <br />Pv.;-.. <br />mm- <br />»■'mi*i»;. *. <br />5|i?:S . <br />rt'w ■■• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MARCH 16, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1716 - CONT. <br />Otten contended that such an undisturbed site on Parcel A does not <br />exist. <br />Chair Kelley reminded the Commission that Parcel A is a current <br />substandard lot, and the applicant is proposing to further reduce <br />that acreage. He noted it is the Comrti i ss i on ’ s <br />substandard lots into conformance, <br />intentions were for Parcel A. <br />asKea <br />intent to bring <br />Otten what his <br />Otten said he would need direction from the City is to allowable <br />uses for the property. He noted the roof on the structure on <br />Parcel A needs to be replaced. <br />Chair Kelley suggested that Parcels A and B be combined. <br />Otten noted that would be the last resort and he had jomtly <br />purchased the property as a business investment. He suggested that <br />the current proposal was not detrimental to the City. <br />Mabusth asked the applicant to reconsider the proposed Iine between <br />Parcels A and B as many of the improvements on Parcel B are <br />intersected by the proposed lot line. <br />Otten stated they are improvements that could be easily moved, <br />asked why the originally approved alternate d r.infield site <br />Parcel B was now rejected. <br />He <br />for <br />Weckman stated that site was at the lowest point of the property <br />and drainage flows through the area. <br />Mabusth noted they will review previously approved septic site <br />Information in original subdivision application to determine if <br />that site can still be used. <br />It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Bel lows, to recommend tabi ing <br />of Application #1716 for Clifford L. Otten and Timothy W. Otten of <br />3740 and 3800 West Wayzata Boulevard to allow time for further <br />septic testing to be completed. Ayes 5, • *ys 0. <br />(#2) #1721 ALBERT HANSER, <br />1685 FOX STREET - <br />PRELIMINA.9Y SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING 7.45 - 7:53 P.M. <br />ThoAffidc./i \ of Pub licationand Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />m
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.