Laserfiche WebLink
-rr- <br />6-* J,-' <br />,v*.v'> <br />!#■ <br />J <br />;.i'y. <br />f ...:. <br />pv. <br />pi <br />M IS <br />if:/'- <br />I® <br />'■M-im <br />IP'P' <br />T‘^‘^ ■■ • <br />P',- <br />M.Pi\ <br />■P;.m <br />;.pi.>:P' <br />Kv':^" • <br />^v’?. <br />■:&¥>. <br />PHONE NO <br />■PVi'' <br />pP;i? <br />pPPp' <br />«•'■ ,»(r'f.. <br />ifei;' ■'tliHV • Qi:. '> <br />V ** <br />& <br />If! <br />m t <br />.^! ■* <br />■>? <br />:4Prp-te <br />..■7 • <br />^ :i ■ <br />l'' »• <br />»w <br />.^■ .y:- <br />■rt'\- <br />p%. <br />u< <■ <br />a:P-^'P <br />iKr J <br />V. <br />f§¥ <br />►r <br />ipi <br />Sill:’: y <br />STATE OF <br />ij^D^lSOTT^ <br />I^DEPARTMENT <br />METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, <br />772-7910 <br />OF NATURAL RESOURCES "■ <br />MN 55106 <br />PILE NO <br />April 7, 1992 APR 8 1992 <br />Mr. Mike Gaffron <br />City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />RE: REVIEW OF SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE, CITY OF <br />HENNEPIN COUNTY <br />ORONO, <br />Dear Mr. Gaffron: <br />Thank you for submitting the city of Orono's most current shoreland <br />management ordinance. As you know, we have begun review of the <br />ordinance for compliance with state standards. Your efforts to <br />assist us in our review are appreciated. <br />Additional explanation and/or justification is needed for the <br />following flexibility requests addressed in your March 12, 1992 <br />mono: <br />1.A.2. Steep Slope Definition - Orono's current code defines <br />steep slopes as those g'**eater than 18% rather than 12%. <br />Further justification is needed. For example, does the city <br />have any technical studies or reports that support the use of <br />18% for the steep slope definition. <br />2.D.2. Lock Boxes in bluff and shore irp?^^ c ^ nes - It appears <br />that the lock boxes, as defined by the orono ordinance, would <br />be a subset of the water oriented accessory structures that <br />the city could allow. If the city required a 10 foot setback, <br />no flexibility would be required. What is the justification <br />for not requiring a 10 foot setback? <br />We are in the process of doing a detailed review of the ordinance, <br />and may have further questions in the future, however, the <br />requested information should be forwarded to this office as soon as <br />it is available. <br />Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions <br />regarding this request. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ceil Strauss <br />Area Hydrologist <br />cc: Ed Pick <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER