Laserfiche WebLink
P-te>.^rx,pi'i- <br />rn%'' <br />il^.- <br />^5:- <br />PM <br />pp: <br />m. <br />%■ftr- <br />;^i'x <br />■ ' • ' •' <br />.'■iSJ';' . <br />rbJ;- <br />W <br />i <br />r -M <br />M& <br />- ■r^-f. <br />^ij- <br />M- A <br />vM <br />■ >?■? , <br />.^r • •feK' ^■ <br />% <br />» -V <br />p, <br />n <br />)p ■ ■ <br />fc-v- <br />Uv : <br />;e:^ <br />•Vm <br />liM'''--m.m <br />P' <br />t- -^ <br />NP <br />i«^-Sfrf,E-»; <br />wfeiw' <br />iP <br />m^-. wrR:-I. <br />f- <br />EXHIBIT P <br />TOx <br />FROM: <br />DATE; <br />SUBJECT; <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager <br />March 12, 1992 <br />#1721 Albert D. Hanser - Subdivision - Septic Review <br />Soil testing has been completed and a report submitted to the City for <br />review. A five lot subdivision is proposed, including one existing <br />residence and four new building sites. I would make the following <br />comments: <br />tot 1 <br />Lot 2 <br />Lot 3 <br />umm.i a^a- <br />Both the main residence and guest house have existing septic <br />systems which appear to be functioning adequately. <br />Slope at the tested sites 0-4%. <br />Percolation rates average 8.1 mpi at 16' depth. <br />Depth to seasonal saturation (mottling) is 2.3-2.5'. <br />Due to shallow seasonal saturation, both sites require mound <br />drainfields. <br />Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. <br />All setbacks meet Code. <br />Slope at the tested sites 0-4%. <br />Percolation rates average 8.8 mpi at 16" depth. <br />Depth to season saturation (mottling) is 2.5-2.8'. <br />Due to shallow seasonal saturation, both sites required <br />mound drainfields. <br />Topographic location and site drainage is adequate. <br />All setbacks meet Code. <br />Slope at the tested sites averages 3-9%. <br />Percolation rates average 10.6 mpi and 2.3 mpi at 16" depth <br />for *the primary and alternate drainfield sites respectively. <br />Depth to seasonal saturation (mottling) is 1.7' in the <br />primary site, but not observed in the alternate site. <br />Both sites are acceptable mound sites, however the alternate <br />site may allow a standard trench upon further testing. <br />Topography and drainage is adequate. <br />All setbacks meet Code.