My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1992
>
04-13-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2024 10:27:16 AM
Creation date
3/12/2024 10:23:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hr' f- ■(fe. <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 13, 1992 <br />K': <br />STUBBS BAY SEWER - CONT. <br />Moorse explained that the resolution also sets forth that a newly <br />created bulldable lot within the area would be charged "00* for the <br />sewer, and If the availability of sewer enables a subdivision or <br />a vacant lot to be bulldable, the owners of such property would <br />also be assessed 100% for sewer In the future. <br />Jabbour stated that since the Council has indicated to the <br />residents that they would participate with the cost, they should <br />do so, but perhaps they should give them a percentage that they <br />will pay and stick to that amount. <br />Callahan suggested that to ensure flexibility they consider <br />adopting a resolution stating the homeowner to pay 100% of the <br />cost. <br />Hurr felt it was unfair to charge a future bulldable lot more than <br />currently developed lots are being charged. <br />Moorse stated that the magnitude of benefit is much greater for a <br />newly created bulldable lot. <br />Rowlette stated that residents attending the last meeting were <br />angry until the Council stated they would pay a portion of the <br />cost. She felt the assessment hearing would not be well received <br />If residents were notified In advance that the City would not pay <br />a portion of the cost. She felt they should not inflate the <br />assessment and Increase the percentage the City pays to make the <br />City look good. <br />Callahan indicated he only suggc^sted the 100% assessment to allow <br />greater flexibility should a major change arise. <br />Jabbour suggested by letting the residents know up front t ■:at there <br />Is a contingency built Into the dollar amount, they may be more <br />sat IsfIed. <br />Cook thought It is good idea to remind residents that the easier <br />the easement acquisition Is the more the total cost will be <br />reduced. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution #3110 declaring cost to be assessed and ordering <br />preparation of proposed assessment roll. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />Jabbour directed staff to review whether CDBG funds could be used <br />to help residents In need pay for the sewer project. <br />% V ^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.