Laserfiche WebLink
�ONp CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> jq � NO. 7452 <br /> kESHO4 <br /> The lot size, width, topography, and existing improvements have not been created by the <br /> current homeowner; and <br /> c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." <br /> The project would not impact the essential character of the locality. The proposed home is <br /> in a similar location as the existing home except for that it will be further removed from <br /> the sensitive bluff area. This criterion is met. <br /> 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations <br /> have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar <br /> energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § <br /> 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not <br /> applicable. <br /> 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City <br /> Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition <br /> is not applicable,as a residential home is a permitted use in the LR-1B District. <br /> 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- <br /> family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. <br /> 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or <br /> immediately adjoining property."The special conditions of the property include the unique location of <br /> a channel,topography,and location of existing structures. This criterion is met. <br /> 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is <br /> located." The request is specific to this property which is impacted by an existing bluff and an extreme <br /> average lakeshore setback determined by one neighbor. The proposal to construct a new home in a <br /> similar location to the existing home with it being pulled further away from the bluff is supported by <br /> practical difficulties. This criterion is met. <br /> 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant.". The requested variances allow for the construction of a new and <br /> modern home in a similar location to the existing home.The existing home is nonconforming due to a <br /> very small building envelope.The variances from average lakeshore setback and from the bluff setback <br /> are necessary in order to construct the home and driveway. This criterion is met. <br /> 4 <br />