03-23-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

■ r.''’i‘-m tei ^:\h:.\^ tr- ''.X' S' ■ p-‘ ls $0 .,}rk:;- '% ^■tMr kk' W: lif I; •V ^V.;. -m%. - ■ k Y' tik ;■ S'■•..-■ "r'S! kM(k : v.^»' it 'x-h"\-:-- •^;k:.: kkm--->A^:kV. \5Y'- ti#' :i.fe' j ;• file- '■' Zoning File # 1723 Harch 6, 1992 Page 2 Description of Request for Variances MSSm The first part of the variance application deals with a need for a variance to the allowed total area for accessory structures on this property that contains over 65 acres in area. Refer to the facts noted above. The 22* x 22' addition to the existing that serves the residence structure was constructed without the benefit of a permit review. As structure is open- ended and refered to as lean-to by applicant, Mr. Dickey assumed that a building permit was not necessary for this type of structure. If the property was not legally combined, a setback variance would have been required. Review Exhibit J. Note dtructure intersects west lot l.ne of Tract A, RLS 10^9. with the legal combination the setback variance is no longer required but a variance to the total allowed area for accessory structures is required. The increase in height referenced in Mrs. Dickey's letter occured during the time of the Golden View Drive construction and soon followed by the residential construction. The Dickey's have provided photos of the fence as it existed on the property in earlier years and will be presented for Planning Commission's review. Mrs. Dickey's addendum notes the history of the fencing, the need for the alteration for an increase in height and the hardships. For members who will ask the customary question, "Why is the City dealing with the issue of the fence height at this time?", staff would refer you to the earlier letters sent to the applicant. Exhibit L, and also that this matter was first noted bo the staff by at least two members of the Commission. If the variance for the addition to the detached garage is approved, staff would eck that you condition approval on applicants obtaining a penalty building permit for the unauthorised construction. At this time applicant may consider adding doors to the 3-sided st-iucture. Mon-Reatal/Guest Bouse Unit Applicant was asked to filer a conditional use permit for the second residential unit when the legal combination was applied for on February 24th. The structure is older and was probably part of the former farm homestead. The structure has been maintained by the Dickey's. It is staff's understanding that their daughter resides in the residence. Applicants understand completely that the structure can never be rented in its current status. If the applicants plan to either rent or sell this structure in the future, there is adequate area to support the 2- acre required area standard. Your approval of this conditional use permit must be conditioned on the structure never being off^ red for rent.