Laserfiche WebLink
m- <br />V' <br />L_l <M> <br />racaj also depend uponChan 5 minutes pei: inch. The allowable percolation , . uj <br />the slope of the original ground surface. A table 't the^e re.atxonships <br />is presented on pagr E-8. It should be noted that mound construction be­ <br />gins with the 12-inc . layer of clean sand upon whicn the roc.< is place-. <br />The design material presented in section E of this Manual suggejrs a <br />possible "cookbook” approach and is intenued to deal pr'.mariiy witn mounds <br />or "berms" for single family residences, or daily sewage flow rates of no <br />more than 1,200 gallons. A flow of 1,200 gallons per day can be treated <br />with a rock bed 10 feet wide by 100 feet xong in a propeny construe.e- <br />mound or "berm." However, the proper hydraulic operation of a mound depends <br />upon lateral a.s v;el? as vertical seepage. Wiile there is little douot that <br />rock beds wider chan 10 feet will operate satisfactorily on some soils as <br />far as flow hydraulics is concerned, a ca "ul analysis must be made of the <br />ground slope and soil permeability underlying Clio clean sand layer Ot t..e <br />mound. <br />A vertical separation of at least 3 feet is required cetween the hot.cm of <br />Che rock bed and any restricting layer in order to maintain aerobic condi­ <br />tions in Che clean sand under the rock layer. (Mien consolidated impermeable_ <br />bedrock is present the vertical separation distance is 7 feet.) Mien aerobic <br />conditions exist in the clean sand, the long-term acc<_ycance rate will be 1.- <br />gallons per day per square foot. If Che depth to the restriccing layer is <br />inadequate or the rock bed is too wide, anaerobic conditions may exist and <br />cause a much slower acceptance race. To evaluate Che possitLlity or anaerobi <br />conditions and the subsequent hydraulic failure is Che ma]cr design problem <br />when sizing mounds larger chan those required for single :ami_y resicen-es. <br />Thus, the design criteria of section E cannot be simply multiplied by a scale <br />factor and expected to properly treat larger flows. The hydrau.iv,s of ..aceral <br />and vertical movement in the clean sand layer and the soil uruer the elevated <br />rock bed must be carefully analyzed to ascertain that anaerobic condici'jns <br />will not exist. Thus, both lateral and horizontal permeabilities of the.under <br />lying soil layers must be utilized to analyze the flow regime to estimate the <br />height of the saturated zone. <br />Where heavy clay soils with slow permeabilities and high seasonal saturated <br />conditions generally exist over an area, ic is far better to utilize mounds <br />for one or two single family residences Chan to collect the effluent from <br />many residences than attempt to dispose and treat ic at a single location. <br />The flow hydraulics in clay soils will require ecther large depths of fill, <br />or underdrainage, or beth, in order to design a proper sewage treatment sy -.em <br />to prevent anaerobic conditions under the rock layer. As an example, a mout.-J <br />designed to treat 450 gallons per day may function very well under certain <br />clay soil conditions, while a single mound serving 5 or 10 residences will <br />fail hydraulically if constructed according to the same vertical separation <br />specifications. <br />Proper construction practices for mounds are extremely important but^when <br />carefully followed will produce a sewage treatment system that will .unction <br />effectively on a long-term basis. There are an estimated 5.000 single family <br />mounds successfully treating sewage in Minnesota. Many Minnesota <br />have found that properly designed and constructed mounds or^ berms ^ <br />effective method of sewage treatment and accept taem as a s.ar.uard s, s