Laserfiche WebLink
r: <br />r <br />Battle Lines Shape Up Over House Bill <br />By Vincente Pasdeloup <br />IIsTiif: House Telecommunications <br />Mand Finance Subcommiltee prepares <br />In vole on cable legislation b/ mid-March, <br />the bailie lines are being drawn. <br />In light of a telco drive to make sure <br />any House bill includes an amendment <br />that paves the way for telcos to get into <br />the cable business with as little restric ­ <br />tion as possible. Trygve Myhren. presi ­ <br />dent of the Providence Journal Co., has <br />suggested that the cable industry and <br />broadcasters need to call a truce. <br />In a Feb. 18 speech to the Washington <br />Metro Cable Club, Myhren presented an <br />alternative to retransmission consent. <br />Under his plan, cable systems would <br />pay a "modest" compilers fee represerU- <br />ing 2-2.5 percent of gross revenue from <br />broadcast tiers to a pool that would be di ­ <br />vided among local stations according to <br />llteir ratings. <br />Tlie Providence Journal Co. favors <br />keeping the compulsory license for local <br />signals, gradually eliminaling it for dis- <br />Lnnt signals, and "reasonable" must-carry <br />and channel positioning for local signals. <br />Myhren said. <br />"1 am baffled by the fact that many lo <br />cal broadcasters support retransmission <br />consent," Myhren said. “In the case of <br />network affdiates. their network com ­ <br />pensation will be cut if the local station <br />receives any money for granting re ­ <br />transmission." <br />Syndicators also will take any money <br />paid by cable operators, he added. <br />Myhren said he hasn't discussed his <br />proposal with other members of the Me ­ <br />dia Group, a coalition of companies with <br />interests in cable and broadcast. Tlie Na ­ <br />tional Association of Broadcasters had no <br />comment on Myhren's plan. <br />The U..S Telephone Assot ialion is <br />preparing an amendment to a House ca <br />ble bill that would let telephone comP'i- <br />nies into the cable TV business with few <br />restrictions. <br />The USTI?. askeii two members of ilie <br />subcommittee. Reps. Rick Boucher (D- <br />Va.) and Michael Oxley (ROliin). to in­ <br />troduce their .amendment on a bipartisan <br />seriously doubt we are <br />going to see rapid approval <br />of telco legislation after the <br />Judiciary Committee hearing <br />this week.” <br />Stephen Effros <br />(irfsiiicnt <br />Community Anlrnna Television Association <br />b.isis. but the representatives haven't giv­ <br />en final approval <br />Tie telco amendment would include <br />fewer restrictions than a similar bill intro ­ <br />duced by Sen. Conr,i<l Burns (R-Mont ) <br />that's pending before the Senate Commu ­ <br />nications Subcommiltee. according to a <br />telephone industry source. <br />bearing date set <br />The Burns bill would allow all (He- <br />phonf companies, including Boll holding <br />companies, into the business of providing <br />video programming if they build a fiber <br />optics nelwork and gel approval for Iheir <br />plans from the FCC and their slate public <br />utilities commissions. A hearing on the <br />bill has been scheduled FH> 28. <br />-1 seriously doubt we are going to <br />see rapid approval of telco legislation af ­ <br />ter the Judiciary Committee bearing <br />this week.** said Stephen Fffros. presi ­ <br />dent of the Community Antenna Televi- <br />sion Association. <br />A’ a Feb. 19 hearing, the chnirmnn of <br />the Mouse Judiciary Fconornic and Com <br />nicrcial I>aw subcommittee. Rep. Jack <br />Brooks (fvTexas). Innted that be would <br />introduce legislation to limit telco entry <br />into information services. <br />le cable industry's strategy at this <br />point is »o prevent retransmission con ­ <br />sent from being included in the House <br />bill, according to observers. Tlic provi ­ <br />sions currently are in a stand alone bill. <br />Hie elections also will play a large role <br />in the future of any cable legislation, ac ­ <br />cording to Capitol Hill observers. <br />Depending on the source, the threat <br />of a presidential veto may have in- <br />''reased or lessened after President <br />Bush's showing in the New Hampshire <br />primary. The current political debate fa ­ <br />vors candidates who prefer less, rather <br />than more, government intervention in <br />the business world. Fffros said. One Re ­ <br />publican source said a veto would de ­ <br />pend on what type of bill is finally passed <br />and at what point in the campaign it <br />reaches Bush's desk. <br />Meanwhile, Jeff Chester of Ralph <br />Nader’s Center for Democracy is leading <br />an aggressive press campaign against <br />senators who voted against S. 12 — in <br />particular. Sens. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.) <br />John Kerry (D Mass.). Ted Stevens (R- <br />Alaska) and Tim Wirth (D-Colo.). <br />Chester has said he ’ll do the same thing <br />in the House by targeting Representa ­ <br />tives who receive large contributions <br />from the cable industry ’s political action <br />committees. <br />Supporters of telco entry will get the <br />same treatment, Chester said.