Laserfiche WebLink
‘ 'l' ’r <br />It- <br />I' <br />■W <br />-.r <br />M: <br />'■X <br />hhli <br />t‘. <br />p' <br />'i-V' <br /><-.r . <br />--I'.‘. <br />... -j- <br />•/ <br />.«{ <br />Zoning File #1712 <br />February 12, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits - <br />A - Application <br />B - Property Owners List <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Application #1685 - Hardcover Improvements <br />E - Current Application - Hardcover Improvements <br />F - Application #1685 - Existing and Proposed Site Plans <br />G - Current Application - Existing, Approved Proposal and <br />Revised Proposal - Site Plan <br />H - Hardcover Comparisons <br />I - Resolution #3028 Approving Application #1685 <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant now resides in the residence and after review of the <br />comprehensive improvement plan for his lakeshore yard now requests <br />reconsideration of an amended proposal. It appears that with <br />application #1685 much of the outdoor pool improvements or activity <br />areas were placed in front of the viewing windows of the living room. <br />The current application now places the majority of those improvements <br />to the west resulting in a decrease of structure within the 0-75' <br />setback area and a slight increase in the wetland setback area as <br />noted above by staff. In the original improvement plan the walkway <br />around the west edge of the pool was limited to a maximum 2' width. <br />The current proposal now provides a safer and functional connecting <br />area. This expansion does result in a net increase of 37 s.f. of <br />structure within the wetland setback area. As in the original review, <br />the 10' high access way along the west side of the pool has not been <br />included in the hardcover calculation. Total deck area has been <br />reduced in size; approved with application #1685 was 1,322 (647 s.f. <br />0-75*, 675 s.f. in 75-250'). Current proposal shows total deck area <br />at 1,194 s.f. (490 s.f. within 0-75', 704 s.f. within 75-250' setback <br />area). As in the earlier review, hardcover reductions result from the <br />removal of existing hardcover improvements, i.e., brick paths, <br />landscape areas underlined with plastic and removal of grade level <br />patio areas. <br />Statement of Hardships and Findings <br />Planninc Commission's original approval ir based on the issues of <br />safety and a logical design in relation to the pool and stairway. A <br />major factor was obviously the reduction in hardcover. The original <br />findings hold true for this second review. with application #1712 <br />there are additional decreases in hardcover within the 0-75' and the <br />deck structure is set further away from the 929.4 elevation. Based on <br />current survey information, it is difficult to give an accurate <br />setback but it appear* to be an ?«<^Hitional 7* to 8'.