My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
03-09-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 2:04:56 PM
Creation date
3/5/2024 2:02:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.r ' <br />ff’^' <br />¥ <br />V. <br />;V <br />.• i <br />:'5. <br />M <br />■''i^'^f: <br />X <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. <br />Mayor Peterson noted it was Implied at that meeting that there was <br />a majoi p-oblem with only one alternative for a solution. <br />Callahan noted that the Committee was promised at the beginning <br />that they would be the deciding body on such decisions. <br />Jabbour asked that a specific agenda be sent to Committee members <br />a week prior to the meeting to allow those who wished to attend to <br />make necessary arrangements to attend the meeting. <br />Callahan noted that Bellows was never informed of the Iasi <br />Committee meeting. <br />Goetten asked if the last meeting was so Important, why were they <br />waiting three more weeks to get tosetfier. <br />Moorse explained that the lack of a decision by the Committee would <br />not delay the plans for bid. <br />Jabbour understood that the public works building was put on hold <br />until the elevation was decided for the ot^'er uuildings. <br />Moorse explained that after the meeting with the architect and <br />construction manager, the deadline for plans for bid were to be <br />ready by March 16th and bids would arrive back at City Hal I by mid- <br />April. He stated that Boarman would be sending him conceptual <br />plans for the audio/visual equipment to be incorporated within the <br />detailed plans. <br />Goetten reminded Moorse to contact the City of Minnetrista for <br />comments on their audio/visual system. <br />Cook explained that the soils expert felt it necessary to lift the <br />entire project in order to compensate for poor soils. He noted he <br />had explained to public works a way to maintain elevation and <br />control drainage. He noted the original design allowed for a low <br />spot in the middle of the driving lane for drainage, but that had <br />been changed to allow drainage in the gutter lines. <br />Jabbour asked why additional fill would be added to raise the <br />elevation rather than remove the poor soils. <br />Cook explained they were conce^'ned with drainage under the parking <br />lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.