03-09-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f'.; mmg;vv-.- is.mm Mu iSmmmM. biSS“d:" IS ’JfJ ■'PPim-r W--SB'fe-^ * -j * H- i.-^ ' *' >x -i vnw: ■ . Vf;i|: ! * • [■•Mm li'S r;v- - -• mm--- ' '■ r ss- r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 ZONING FILE #1682 - CONT. Jabbour reminded them tiiat t ie> are stil meet building code stancirds. I not sure the garage wiI I Callahan stated he does not feel responsible for the trusses. Gaffron asked If the garage was to be moved over 7’, how the garage would f action. Brickley noted the door would be changed to the south side, but reminded them that there are four other neighbors that use the drive and it would be greatly reduced by the garage encroachment. She reiterated that she would be wi I I i ng to remove the 11 x32 excess slab on the south and put up gutters on the west side if the garage was allowed to remain. Gaffron asked about easements that the neighbors may have over the shared drive. Brickley stated the neighbors do not have an easement. Gaffron asked if t le garage was moved over f', and the door moved to the southern e d, would the door be centered, and if so, would the dr Iveway neea to be aaded onto to allow accessibility to the garage. Callahan reiterated that the Planning Commission reviewed this issue on December I6th, and felt that Council should not waste time on planning. Jabbour suggested they relay their concerns to staff. There wns no motion to reconsider the I i cat i <^n. (#6) SHORELANO REGULATION ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE #101, 2ND SERIES Moorse exp'dned tnis is the ordinance drafted by the Lake Use Comm.ttee and has bf “^n recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission. Goetten asked If ihey would be moving too fast If they removed the subdivision moratorium prior to the DNR approval of the ordinance. Callahcn stated that the DNR regulations did not need to be In effect until fall of 1992. .... 'L'