Laserfiche WebLink
p|> <br />^•i.. <br />■*...' <br />pLV • •*•>fc- <br />i <br />fe <br />i? <br />!?*>.=-.■ <br />'. I <br />V :.'•- <br />m <br />»'V ^ <br />V J <br />0' <br />■s <br />n . <br />iip <br />y r\ • j- <br />fP ^ <br />'t-t.;mrip <br />Stev. <br />■if^- ■ .; a.- -t. ■•' - >- <br />> *4 <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEWS - CONT. <br />Peterson commented this Is his home for many years to come and <br />wanted to insure the quality of his children’s future. <br />Mayor Peterson announced that the decision will be made at the <br />Council meeting of March 9th. <br />Jaobour noted there is only one vacancy and urgeu all aopMcants <br />who are not chosen at this time tr reapply in the future. <br />(#4) ADMINISTRATION OF OATH <br />Moorse explained that they had approximately 80 candidates for the <br />part-time police officer positions and they had interviewed <br />approximately 20 of those candidates. <br />Moorse administered the oath of office to Scott Boris and John <br />Schoenhoff. <br />(#6) #1682 CHRISTINE BRICKLEY, <br />3262 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />VARIANCE - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION <br />Moorse explained that this is a variance request that the Council <br />has reviewed in the past. He noted when the appi icant was last <br />before the Council, the applicant had intended to request the <br />application be tabled, but failed to do so. Upon request that she <br />Sign the adopted resolution, she Indicated that she wished to <br />reappear before the Council with her attorney. <br />Craig Mertz, applicant’s attorney, noted that his client is asking <br />the Council to reconsider part of the action approved at the last <br />meeting. He explained that his client wanted to replace all the <br />old structures on her property with the new garage, to al low <br />adequate storage on the property. He noted that the Counci I <br />directed that Brickley remove the westerly portion of the garage, <br />but explained that her contractor will not guarantee the work on <br />the pre-engineered trusses, which means she would have to hire a <br />structural engineer to oversee the project. He noted the <br />resolution states that one reason for denial of the setback <br />variance is open space and stated that the neighbor to the west Is <br />not opposed to the proposal. He stated Brickley is requesting the <br />Council to either grant the side yard setback variance or to allow <br />her to move the garage eastward 7’, outside of the 10’ required <br />setback. He noted that the move would be costly and would cut into <br />the shared driveway area.