Laserfiche WebLink
I -'' \v * ft*r'' *‘?■)*' f- <br />N '!/ <br />ft-' <br />Ir <br />•* *.’ *•«j <br />i*V-y-,rv':'-t' <br />UiiJWWi^r-. <br />'v;V'?^' <br />Kv, ■ ;■ <br />■ ■ <br />•>» « .. . <br />■u%*;.r <br />i--^r <br />hf^v <br />*% ^ <br />* <br />fJ:#? <br />Ki' <br />i: <br />I. <br />'0U <br />f-. <br />■ » *''^- <br />>s <br />i- • <br />r-’-f;/y&.S <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE t1713 - CONT. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval <br />of Application 4M713 for Whitney and Betty MacMillan of 1560 Fox <br />Street for a conditional use permit to allow relocation of an <br />existing retention area, p^r the requirements by the City Engineer <br />that erosion control be provided. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />(#5) #1714 THOMAS W. LYlLE, <br />1935 CONCORDIA STREET - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7:14-7:23 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication <br />acknowI edged. <br />and Certificate of Mailing were <br />Mr. Lytle was present for this application. <br />Lytle explained that a survey from 1955 in tne City f|•®s <br />Incorrectly showed the house location and was absent an addition. <br />He noted when planning for a proposed deck, he used that survey. <br />At Mabusth’s suggestion, an updated survey was done. He stated <br />that survey reduced the lakeshore setback Iine by 11 forcing <br />proposed deck Into the protected area. He explained the south side <br />of his property slopes down, and by locating the deck there, would <br />be very close to the neighbors’ deck and living room. <br />Bellows asked if it would be feasible to move the deck 90 degrees. <br />Mabusth stated that the lakeshore setback line does not remain at <br />9’ adjacent to the residence but as it extends northward, it <br />decreases to approximately 6’. <br />Lytle announced that a bay window is located on the lake side of <br />the house, which would prohibit the deck to be located at that <br />location. <br />Chair Kelley suggested the applicant come buck to the Commif ion <br />with a revised plan and felt he should contact his neighbo. s to <br />review the plan with them. <br />Lytle noted that by putting the deck on the south side of the <br />house, two mature trees would need to be removed, and the southern <br />corner of the house is alI windows and the trees provide shade and <br />privacy for that portion of the house. <br />It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to table <br />AppIication #1714, Thomas W. Lytle, 1935 Concordia Street, to allow <br />applicant time to red* ign his proposal. Ayes 4, nays 0.