Laserfiche WebLink
pSj'? <br />-ilV <br />« *■ h-> <br />m.-.m <br />ift. <br />- t' "* ' • <br />*■' <br />;> •>■ <br />€ <br />r <br />%> <br />^,. <br />W • <br />^v?fv <br />'• -‘Jt'm <br />'* ■ <br />>. -t <br />'■tiSt <br />!, <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1682 - CONT. <br />Jabbour reminded them that they are still not sure the garage wiI I <br />meet building code standards. <br />Callahan stated he does not feel responsible for the trusses. <br />Qaffron asked If the garage was to be moved over 7’, how the garage <br />would function. <br />Brickley noted the door would be cnanged to the south side, but <br />reminded them that there are four other neighbors that use the <br />drive and It would be greatly reduced by the garage encroachment. <br />She reiterated that she would be willing to remove the ll’x32’ <br />excess slab on t^e south and put up gutters on the west side if <br />the garage was allowed to remain. <br />Qaffron asked about easements that the neighbors may have over tne <br />Shared drive. <br />Brickley stated the neighbors do not ha^« an easement. <br />Gaffron asked if the garage was moved over , and the door moved <br />to the southern end, would the door be centered, and if so, would <br />the driveway need to be added onto to allow accessibiIity to the <br />garage. <br />Callahan reiterated that the Planning Commission reviewed this <br />istue on December 16th, and felt that Council should not waste time <br />on planning. <br />Jabbour suggested they relay their concerns to staff. <br />There was no motion to reconsider the application. <br />(#6) 8HORELAND REGULATION ORDINANCE ~ ORDINANCE #101, 2ND SERIES <br />Moorse explained this is the ordinance drafted by the Lake Use <br />Committee and has been recommended for adoption by the Plann’ng <br />Ccmmission. <br />Qoetten asked If they would be moving too fast if they removed the <br />subdivision moratt-rlum prior to the DNR approval of the ordinance. <br />Callahan stated tnat the DNR regulations did not need to be In <br />effect until fall of 1992. <br />6