Laserfiche WebLink
fe-P%, <br />l^j: . ’• ft <br />"i'' <br />ppfe: '^' <br />■>'r■'"'Ik'. <br />asEtc'. - '•■>! <br />Pi,' <br />ip ,,ill%> <br />11^6. <br />fc®.. ■" <br />gasS"' fiSf:'pp'" <br />Sip. <br />i»p <br />l^k <br />r:-'v>^-‘pr %P. ■ <br />ffiwlilf..a <br />Eils, <br />i <br />fc--, <br />W’^Is <br />:;vs - -pVs <br />.= - : <br />laip^isl <br />If'ft: <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEWS - CONT. <br />Peterson commented this is his home for many years to <br />wanted to Insure the quaiity of his children’s future. <br />come and <br />Mayor Peterson announced that the decision <br />Council meeting of March 9th. <br />I be made at the <br />Jabbour noted there is only one vacancy and urged all applicants <br />who are not chosen at this time to reapply in the future. <br />(#4) ADMINISTRATION OF OATH <br />Moorse explained that they had approximately 80 candidates for the <br />part'^time police officer positions and they had interviewed <br />approximately 20 of those candidates. <br />Moorse administered the oath of off <br />Schoenhoff. <br />ce to Scott Boris and John <br />(#5) »1682 CHRISTINE BRICKLEY. <br />3262 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />VARIANCE • REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION <br />Moorse explained that this Is a variance request that the Council <br />has reviewed In the past. He noted whe. the applicant was last <br />before the Council, the applicant had .ntended to request the <br />application be tabled, but failed to do sc. Upon request that she <br />sign the adopted resolution, she indicated that she wished to <br />reappear before the Council with her attorney. <br />Craig Mertz, applicant’s attorney, noted that his client Is asking <br />the Council to reconsider part of the action approved at the last <br />meeting. He explained that his client wanted to replace all the <br />old structures on her property with the new garage, to allow <br />adequate storage on the property. He noted that the CounciI <br />directed that Brickley remove the westerly portion of the garage, <br />but explained that her contractor will not guarantee the work on <br />the pre-engineored trusses, which meanc she would have to hire a <br />structural engineer to oversee the project. He noted the <br />resolution states that one reason for denial of the setback <br />variance is open space and stated that the neighbor to the west Is <br />not opposed to the proposal. He stated Brickley is requesting the <br />Council to either grant the side yard setback variance or to allow <br />her to move the garage eastward 7’, outside of the 10’ required <br />setback. He noted that the move would be costly and would cut Into <br />the shared driveway area.