Laserfiche WebLink
►T» '-D-'.**) <br />minutes of the orono planning commission meeting <br />HELD OCTOBER 15, 1990 <br />ATTENDANCE 7z00 P.M. <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on uhe a^ove u^ate wi^n ^ne <br />following members present: Planning Commission Chair Charlie <br />and Planning Commission Member Ed Cohen, Jim Hanson, and <br />Candace Rowlette. The following represented the City Staff: <br />Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and <br />Zoning Administrator Gaffron. and City Recorder Scheffler. <br />m PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'AMENDMENT #3 <br />^as the consensus of the Planning Commission that review <br />of this item be delayed due to the absence of three Planning <br />Commission members. <br />I- <br />#1470 BILL KNAPP/DAN PARTEN <br />4300 BATSIOE ROAD <br />PRBLXMIIIRRT SUBDIVISION <br />referral from council <br />7sOC P.M. TO 7:20 P.M. <br />Mr. Knapp was present.V, !* ,t'.,-- - ... <br />t-’- <br />.n' <br />^ r r ,. -■ <br />Gaffron stated that Mr <br />Mr. Parten. He said. <br />Knapp has purchased this property <br />r«.. .. . . . . . .. . . . "Mr. Knapp intends to develop the <br />property as a three-lot PRD. as previously suggested by staff and <br />the Planning Commission." Gaffron showed a sketch of the <br />property and the planned development. He said, "One of the <br />conceras expressed'^ in previous reviews involved <br />*■ , ...^■ ‘'■•I _ ^ ^ ^ . 1 - . -A A. « ^piicels north of this property. Currently these properties <br />achieve access by crossing the Luce Line and the owners prefer xt <br />that way. Is it necessary to consider a future alternate access <br />via Mr. Knapp's property? Another issue is a possible <br />north/south connecting corridor. Again, the residents in the <br />area were opposed to such a proposal. With regard to the Nature <br />Conservancy, the Public Works Director has asked that an easement <br />be provided with this PRD to access that property." Gaffron <br />reviewed the other issues relating to this development (see <br />Michael Gaffron*s memo dated September 18, 1990). <br />1 <br />Kelley asked Gaffron to comment on the proposed alternate <br />^U^'septic site proposed for Lot 1, Block 1. <br />4- ' <br />Kelley asked, "It may be the only alternative, but does it <br />sense and will it work?" <br />Gaffron replied, "It is the only option available." <br />Gaffron replied, "From a technical standpoint, it is <br />0 :^ "to pump over to the alternate site. It is a long <br />■*•''' distance and will require a large pump. Due to the steep slopes <br />of the property, <br />alternate site." <br />that is the only possible location for an <br />- 1 -