Laserfiche WebLink
r* ‘b <br />0 <br />k.- <br />i- <br />'•4‘ <br />K-- <br />W ^ <br />fll-V <br />■'.'■■ - '-'1 <br />-B- <br />i"P^'1%--k <br />« <br />•'% <br />(5^-;ti*'®'-: <br />m:: <br />v4 <br />v;-; <br />m V- <br />Jill <br />i'S"'*>:- <br />P’-V <br />r.* <br />m <br />% <br />0. rtr-. <br />1^. <br />m <br />i.9' <br />Sfe <br />IsI <br />,K ' <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 10, 1992 <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. <br />Madge regarding his concerns <br />Goetten reminded them that Orono is <br />the Council should address Madges c <br />to change the ordinance <br />a rural area <br />1 ef cont dc Mr . <br />and agreed that <br />not feel a need <br />(#4) #1470 & #1706 WILLIAM & EVELYN KNAPP, <br />4300 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION/PRD - RESOLUTION #3069 <br />William and Evelyn Knapp wore present for this application <br />Moorse explained this Is an appiication for conditional use permi <br />approval for a PRD for a three lot subdivision which has received <br />conceptual approval from the Counci I . He noted the PRD <br />Incorporates the conditions and special setbacks for the property. <br />Mabwsth explained the resolutiort does not yet incorporate the <br />special setbacks for accessory structures. She explained that <br />beca-se of the covenant that would restrict building within areas <br />In excess of 18X slope, two of the lots will be greatly impactea <br />and therefore it is being suggested tnat special consideration be <br />given in placing accessory structures in front of the front line <br />of the principal structure. <br />Knapp stated that the existing residence on the property would need <br />to be expanded .c he In keeping with the surrounding neighborhood <br />properties. <br />Mabusth noted that the current code dees not allow a credit for <br />dry buildable of areas in excess of 18* slopes. The code does not <br />stated that you cannot build in such areas. She explained that <br />this condition was Imposed to minimize the impact on the trees on <br />the property. She felt that a detailed survey would show a-eas <br />where the existing residence could be expanded which would be out <br />of the 18* slope limitation area. <br />Goetten asked why they should grant <br />structures in advance. <br />a variance for accessory <br />Mabusth Indicated that they were <br />setbacks. She noted that with a PPJ Is i <br />setbacks, we had already in approving <br />proposed 2 to 3 acre pads, <br />minimize future variances. <br />It should <br />creating restricted building <br />t common to create special <br />2 ac»'e standards for the <br />be the goal of a PRD to