01-27-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1381 February 15, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Review of Application - The applicant proposes complete reconstruction of residence structure on the site using only the existing foundation located approximately 61' from the lakeshore setback area. In order to meet the hardcover allowance of 25% within the 75-250' setback area, the applicant proposes the removal of the existing detached garage and a re-location of a trimmed back access drive with backout strip. Approximately 212 s.f. of new structure is proposed within the 0-75' setback area. Applicant proposes the removal of 326 s.f. in order to offset the excess of hardcover at 15.18% existing. The applicant proposes a total reduction of 114 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75* setback area. The reconstructed residence will now be totally located behind the 61' setback area with a 2' upper story deck extending another 2' into the lakeshore protected area at 59'. The previous principal structure was set at 55' with an accessory staircase located 10' from the lakeshore. Issues for Consideration - 1.Is the proposal consistent with similar improvement variance applications (review Exhibit J & K)? In consideration of the Palm application at similar lot area and width standards, the Rhode application has less hardcover than approved in the Palm application. Palms: 0-75' - 17.5% Rhode: 0-75' » 13.3% 75-250'29% 75-250 ’24.8% 2.Are there specific features or functions of the improvement plan that could be improved upon or amended? 3.Have the improvements in structural setbacks from the lake and hardcover reductions offset the 212 s.f. of new structural hardcover within the 0-75' setback area? Based on the conclusions drawn from the discussions above and the factual findings presented by applicant and staff in the review, the following options of action are available to the Planning Commission;