My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
01-27-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 4:03:17 PM
Creation date
2/26/2024 3:59:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
388
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FOLLOW-UP <br />A Broker’s Holiday Wish List <br />w ith the acquisition market <br />once again beginning to heat <br />up and prices steadying (CV, <br />11/18/91). cable broker Jim <br />Boyle of Connecticut-based Frank Boyle <br />&Co. has calculated the hypothetical value <br />of the Top 10" clusters of cable systems <br />in the nation. In deference to the holiday <br />season, he calls tliem his "billion-dollar <br />toys." <br />Ranking first on Boyle's list is Cablevi- <br />sion Systems Corp.’s Long Island cluster, <br />which he values at $1.4 billion <br />^.490/sub). Also above the $1 billion <br />mark Is Time Warner Cable’s Orlando <br />cluster, valued by Boyle at $1.04 billion <br />^,260/sub). Third and fourth place also <br />go to Time Warner clusters: Manhattan <br />(with Paragon) at $835 million and Brook <br />lyn/Queens at $820 million ($1,990 and <br />^410/sub. respectively). Rounding out <br />the topfive is Vboom’s Pliget Sound gro"p <br />at $710 million ^1.870/sub). <br />‘The second ^ on Boyle’s holiday wish <br />list are: Cox San Diego ($640 mil- <br />lion/$l,970 per sub). Times Mirror <br />Phoenix ($590 million/$2,000 per sub), <br />KBLCOM San Antonio ($.^20 million/ <br />$2,210 per sub), Hauser Maryland/Vlr <br />pinia ($500 million/$2,3«0 [>er sub) and <br />Maclean Hunter New Jersey ($500 mil <br />lion/$2,220 per sub). <br />If nothing else, Boyle’s list demon <br />strates that only a company wtli Uie finan <br />cial strength of a major telco can hope to <br />penetrate the upper echelons of tlie cable <br />business. • Tern Kener <br />I Coble In 60.6% of Homesl <br />M EW YORK — Cable penetration rose to 60.6 percent in November,II a 2.7 percent climb from November 1990, when penetration stood <br />at 59 percent, according to figures from Nielsen Media Research. <br />Cable penetration increased by 0J percentage points from July’s 60.3 <br />percent even though the numbCT of cable homes estimated by Nielsen <br />declined from 56.07 million to 55.79 million. That was because Nielsen <br />revised its estimate of the total TV household universe downward in <br />September from 93.1 million to 92.1 million. <br />The rise in c^le penetration in November from the previous ratings <br />in July came after a period of stagnation from May to July, when the <br />number of cable homes remained flat at 56.1 million. <br />‘The numbers are gleaned from NMR’s Nielsen Station Index which <br />is the company’s local marketing ratings service. <br />'The latest figures are more evideiKe that the increase in cable pene <br />tration hu slow^ markedly. From November 1989 to November 1990. <br />penetration had increased by 3.3'percent (See chart page 26.) ■ <br />FCC Revises <br />Rules For <br />Political Ads <br />W <br />By JEANNINE AVERSA <br />ASHINGTON — The Fedcr- <br />^ A - - si Communications Commis <br />sion last Thursday revised its rules <br />pertaining to political advertising <br />on cable systems and broadcast sta <br />tions. The rules don’t apply to ca <br />ble networks. <br />Cable systems that sell political <br />advertising will continue to be re <br />quired to offer candidates their <br />lowest unit charge and must afford <br />equal opportunities to each candi <br />date’s opponents. <br />Revised r jles include requiring <br />both audio and visual sponsorship <br />identification for 'TV ads and re <br />quiring outlets to disclose to can <br />didates all classes of time, discount <br />rates and privileges afforded to <br />commercial advertisers. The FCC <br />also came out with a ruling that <br />pre-empts state action on disputes <br />involving the lowest unit charge. <br />The FCC also ruled that a “rea <br />sonable access” provision, which <br />requires a station to make some air <br />time available to federal carxltdates, <br />does not apply to cable systems. <br />The Notional Cable Television <br />Association raised no objections to <br />the FCCs actions. <br />Because no complaint has ever <br />been filed against a cable network, <br />there's no body of FCC rules on <br />political ads that applies to cable <br />networks, said FCC genera] coun <br />sel Robert IfettiL The policy on ca <br />ble networks is expected to evolve <br />on a case-by-case basis, he said. <br />Pettit said he expects the numbo' <br />’ of political advertising complaints <br />.lodged agains' cable to increase <br />during the I99i' elections as more <br />candidates turn ‘o this medium to <br />distribute their n essages. ■ <br />> ■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.