My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
01-27-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 4:03:17 PM
Creation date
2/26/2024 3:59:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
388
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MARKETING NEW MEDIA/Dec. 16, 1991/P. 4 of 8 <br />HIGHLY PENETRATED SYSTEMSt THE BASIC/PAY TRADEOFF <br />It's the rare cable system that hits home runs on both the basic <br />and pay fronts. Most big-city operations achieve high pay but below-average <br />basic penetration (MARKETING NEW MEDIA, 11/18/91). And the reverse appears <br />to be true for many classic rural systems. <br />The analysis on P. 5 tracks the performance of 48 randomly selected <br />systems with 83Z to 87Z basic penetration of homes passed (HP) at 12/31/88. <br />Two years later, the group's weighted-average basic/HP ratio sliv.>Q<I to 84Z <br />from 85Z, whereas the pay/basic reading held steady at 52Z. <br />Several factors may be responsible for these ratios, which are <br />roughly flip-flopped from U.S. averages (60,IZ basic/HP, 80.2Z pay/basic <br />at Dec. 31, 1990: <br />e The systems in our sample serve communities that read like a Who's <br />Who of rural America, Living outside of major TV markets, residents often <br />can't got clear reception of even broadcast network affiliates without cable. <br />Consequently, a chunk of the sub base includes lighter-viewing and <br />broadcast TV-oriented households that would probably resist cable in an urban <br />area with more over-the-air program choices. They may take basic cable in a <br />rural region, but they're less likely to pay extra for a premium channel. <br />e High basic/HP ratios always depress pay/basic readings. The ^.ample <br />systesis' 43.6Z weighted-average pay penetration of hemes passed, however, fell <br />only slightly below the 48.2Z national average at year-end 1990. <br />e Several of the highly-penetrated systems are classic rural opera <br />tions lacking the channel space to offer all of the major premium services <br />(35 of the 48 systems served fewer than 10,000 subs at Dec. 31, 1990). <br />Another factor at work is the tendency to take basic-only service <br />as monthly basic rates increase. In highly-penetrated systems, the basic/HP <br />ratio also appears to be sensitive to above-average basic rate increases. <br />Of ,the 48 sample systems, 28 (58Z) saw a decline in basic penetration <br />between year-end 1988 and year-end 1990. But among 18 systems that raised <br />basic rates faster than the sample group's weighted-average of 23.6Z during <br />the same timeframe, a much larger percentage (78Z) saw basic penetration fall. <br />Moreover, among 10 systems lifting basic rates by less than lOZ over <br />the two-year period, only two (20Z) suffered a drop in basic penetration. <br />CABLE ' ’AY TV CENSUS--DECEMBER <br />13/31 •1990-91 Chsnga- <br />U.S. TV housahoida (TVHH) <br />Homs passed by cable <br />Basic cable subs <br />Pay cable units <br />Local cable ad hoMS <br />Expanded basics <br />Video shopping hoMS <br />Backyard dishes <br />Backyerd pay TV subs <br />SMATV subs <br />Wireless cable subs (HMDS <br />Homs passed Z of TVHH <br />Shopping hoMS % TVHH <br />Cable subs X of TVHH <br />Backyard dishes Z of TVHH <br />Cable subs Z of hoMS pas: <br />Pay units Z of cable subs <br />‘Projected <br />1990 1991*199?*Unit Percent <br />(mils)91.100 92.100 93.060 1.000 I.IZ <br />(mil.)86.000 87.900 89.400 1.900 2.2 <br />(mil.)51.740 54.060 56.150 2.320 4.5 <br />(mil.)41.510 42.300 43.500 0.793 1.9 <br />(mil.)44.000 48.000 52.000 4.000 9.1 <br />(mil.)12.200 13.000 14.000 0.8C0 6.6 <br />(mil.)65.000 67.000 69.000 2.000 3.1 <br />(mil.)3.030 3.469 3.750 0.439 14.5 <br />(mil.)0.700 0.750 0.825 0.050 7.1 <br />(mil.)0.825 0.885 0.945 0.060 7.3 <br />(mil.)0.148 0.203 0.282 0.055 37.2 <br />94Z 95Z 96Z <br />71Z 73Z 74Z <br />57Z 59Z 60Z <br />3Z 4Z 4Z <br />Id 60Z 62Z 63Z <br />80Z 70Z 77Z <br />1 Paul Kagan Associates, Inc.,estimates. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.