My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
01-13-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 9:42:41 AM
Creation date
2/26/2024 9:39:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
J;UTE5 OP THE OHONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OP OCTOBEH ... 1S9. <br />#1682 - CONT. <br />Johnson fait ?equast ii*'reasonable. <br />Un:it^?hf:ajri^?ng s?:b'siLld n^t be allowad. <br />B.UOWS noted that a hardship for the garage Is the storage of <br />construction equipment. <br />Btickley noted that Is correct. <br />Bowlette noted that no matter «hat ts proposed, at wUl stall end <br />up with a substandard setback. <br />Gail Naffus. Casco P?i"‘ t^asdtng'^too'^iiiuch'^^and '’is only <br />SSted that the neeS!. She noted that the <br />is°In ’thr«Ict‘faae%pot as the previous garage and shed. <br />* , j i_ rKa^T- K«»l lev to recommend <br />It was moved by ,Igj”?or"^Christine Brickley. 3252 North <br />approval of Application /“^.back variance and a hardcover <br />ShSre Drive, for a ot 1^"' existing slab with the <br />variance to construct a g ^m-^ed not larger than ^ <br />provision that the q. the slab and the remaining 8 ofon the northern “°st portion of the si <br />the slab to be removed. Ayes 6, n > <br />(#4) #1683 ROBERT F. SUESS. <br />, p.„. <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />T.J. Haislet was P*'®**5\J°''i‘st%iSe'reqiesting”submitt^ of a <br />Gaffron noted that ®"*j"®®ooieday'* be’^further subdivided. <br />cSoH^"!* ‘«co.iendinr that, there may h® »°«® “®“?'i^‘Lage <br />Tollny finishing the P®‘®i-?^Pr?ine ToipUted no- andalong Vatertown and the east lot ii „gighborhood would have <br />suggSsting that drainage in the «®®fponding m the <br />Sirth'easrci’rrer aftern drainage plan has been submitted. <br />Chair r.lley asked if an extension has been considered of the <br />fo&d to th6 north* <br />mrri*viabu‘opUon S^ng^'cofn-ttorro^^^iesl!"" <br />Haislet asked how the ^°“®j**^°"^®^’^the°^roL^^outlot, but is <br />noted the “FP^icant would g ^^t_^ farther development, with a <br />r®QUSSting only a priva ♦.-,*« thp drive.S^iowneri association to maintain t.ne
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.