My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
01-13-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 9:42:41 AM
Creation date
2/26/2024 9:39:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes of the park commission meeting of DECEMBER 3, 1991 <br />SANDY BEACH SWIMMING BEACH REVIEW - CONT. <br />Faldman noted that the buoys that are placed in the swim area are <br />nSi !S' ?n from the lot line. Me also noted that people bring <br />their pets to the beach and let them run. <br />Vongries noted that the problem has been eliminated, yet a swim <br />srod 1s still ni31 nt31 n6d. <br />Feldman also noted the fence is currently broken and snowmobiles <br />ars crossing onto his property. <br />Chair Flint noted a letter received by Dale Woodbeck, 1445 Cherry <br />Placi. asMnr the City to reinstall the dock n the swim area. <br />The letter is attached to the minutes as Exhibit A. <br />Tt was moved by Vongries. seconded b> Bradley, to recommend thatJSe CoSncn not authorize the installation of a dock at Sandy <br />Beach Swis* Area for the 1992 summer season. <br />Johnston felt that recommenoation should re-lect that the dock <br />not be installed permanently. <br />Tt was moved by Vongries. seconded by Bradley, to recommend tnat <br />JJe Luncn not aCthorIze the insta 1 latlon of the dock at Sandy <br />Beach Swim Area permanently. Ayes 7, nays 0. <br />Use noted she had attended meetings where the neighbors of tne <br />erH dMcrIbed the problems and felt badly for them. She fe t <br />their responsibility is to take complaints of residents ser ou y <br />and do something to Improve the situation if possible. <br />(#S) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT - PLAN REVIEW <br />Oerhardson noted that Cathy Skalicky of Dahlgr-. <br />UbSn hM providad another alternative, as r.quested by the <br />cammlsslon for development with a 2 acre lot site with a trail <br />s%taii>. Flint notad that t.e met with Planning Commission ^ <br />"5:n:]r’?2r'“?MrprSp:rt;:' "°^tsrn;t?r*;h“sr"s‘kSMckj <br />JS§“®Mtbaek ?i:oJ t^. Zetland area. The <br />X H. JxJuX ?nai the eklsting road that runs to <br />thfl noptn of tha proparty could be used as a walking pa <br />p2«.‘^ Sh1?h w2uld be r.tainad for us. aa^.lth.r <br />p«rk land, or if access was provided to the north in <br />possibly a building site. <br />Wilson asked slv*" *be ISO' setback, where the building pad would <br />ba for the 2 buildable lots.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.