My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
01-13-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 9:42:41 AM
Creation date
2/26/2024 9:39:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 9, 19911992 CONTRACTS WITH LONG LAKE - CONT.Sullivan noted that in negotiations prior to the authorization to hire additional personnel, Long Lake had reduced their request for additional manpower. He noted at that time they asked the price for less personnel there was no contract in effect, thl^efore making it fair game to renegotiate the amount of additional personnel. He stated at the Long Lake Council ^eeting^ Long Lake asked him if he would seek to do things as cost <br />effective as possible, and he indicated to them he would. Long <br />Lake also asked if additional manpower and time was required, <br />would Orono notify them prior to the service, and he Indicated he <br />would do that. <br />Jabbour noted the Long Lake budget is tight, as is <br />and he Just wants to make sure that Long Lake will be able to pay <br />its portion for service. <br />Sullivan felt it would be beneficial to have multi-year <br />contracts. <br />Callahan noted the previous year's contract provided that after <br />the expiration of the contract. Long Lake would pay <br />costs ^whether or not they terminated. The current <br />provides that Long Lake pay only if they terminate. <br />that the City of Orono has Incurred these extra costs because of <br />the contract, and he felt Long Lake should pay no matter who <br />terminates the contract. <br />Moorse indicated he thought the language had been changed and <br />will review the contract again. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt the <br />’ contract with the appropriate amendments, as discussed at <br />previously during the meeting. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(*#21) CITY ADMINISTRATOR VACATION REQUEST <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to allow <br />Administrator, Ron Moorse, to ^ake ®26 and FridayTuesday. December 24th and on Thursday. December 26 and Friday, <br />December 27th. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#22) SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY ROAD 15 - RESOLUTION #3059 <br />Goetten wanted to know what type of Improvements are proposed. <br />Butler explained the County is going to do a <br />consider the upgrade of the existing roadbed, and <br />only end up wider in areas where turn lanes are necessary. <br />Goetten noted that the County Road currently <br />and she will never allow for further expansion of the roadbed. <br />Ji
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.