Laserfiche WebLink
Ceil Strauss January 29, 1993 Page 5 setback of existing adjacent houses rather than allowing it to be placed at the setback line.11. Regarding the lack of a requirement that "70% of the shore impact zone on PRD’s must <br />be preserved', actually, our Subdivision 19 (H) (3) (E) requires that 100% of ("the <br />entire") lakeshore setback zone (which includes all of the shore impact zone) must be <br />preserved, except for necessary pedestrian access (stairs, walkways, etc.). I think this <br />more than meets the "more than 70% of shore impact zone" requirements. <br />Actually, I think Steve did an e.xcellent job of reviewing our ordinance and in the areas I’ve <br />noted above, we are prepared to adopt "housekeeping" revisions as necessary. Clearly, there <br />are some areas where we would argue for our position, but in general I don’t see any major <br />problems. <br />Give me a call with your reaction to all this and see if we can agree on a punch list of things <br />we have to do (if any) to finalize our ordinance. <br />Michael P. Gaffron <br />Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />MPG/lsv <br />tV •