Laserfiche WebLink
«%2) * The City's definition of "Shoreland” contains a statement indicatini? the ShoreJand Overlay Diat»*ict has been chang<?d in some areas due to topographic divides. Has adequate documentation been provided to justify these changes? I see so-io areas on the map where the district has been expanded along some atroams but is difficult to determine on such a small map whether'it has been reduced to less than 1000 ft. anywhere adjacent to the lakes. <br />3) 'T'he definitions of public waters, variance, water^orlented <br />acccsiory structure or facility, and wetland could be upgraded in <br />several respects (see check-list). Also, three terms (building <br />line. Commissioner, t feedlot) aro not defined. <br />4) Streams are only listed by name, not legal description. <br />m\ The City should be requested to provide documentation that a <br />revised Zoning Map with a Shoreland Overlay District has been <br />officially adopted. <br />6) The provision for allowing a new house to be placed <br />to the OHWL than the required setback without a variance <br />IS an established building line needs to have the phrase If not <br />In a shore or bluff Impact zone* added. <br />7) For residential PUD'S, the open space requirements do not <br />contain a provision requiring a. least 70% of the shore Impact <br />zone to be kept in its natural or existing state.