My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2024
>
02-20-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 12:34:52 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 3:37:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r�. <br />Exhibit E <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />January 11, 2023 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />6. LA22-000069 BRETT CARBON, 2480 CARMAN STREET, SKETCH PLAN. <br />Oakden said this application is similar to the previous one. They're requesting to split their lot. Again, it <br />fronts on Shoreline Drive and it's a long, narrow lot with that lagoon. This parcel is slightly larger; it's <br />roughly 1.85 acres of land. The lot is improved with a single-family home on the portion that is currently <br />under construction. In 2020, it was an older home. They have since applied for a new home permit, and <br />that's under construction today. I believe on the survey it's calling out the footprint of the original house to <br />be removed. The northern inlet on the north side of the lagoon is unimproved. The property is unique <br />with, again, the split zoning LR 1 B or a one -acre minimum to the south and LR 1 C one half -acre <br />minimum to the north. Again, it's heavily wooded with the grading drops but less impacts of wetland on <br />this parcel. The applicant's goal is to facilitate a new building site on the north of the inlet. And similar to <br />the 2022 application, they are proposing the north lot would be conforming. The southern lot would be <br />non -conforming. The existing parcel is conforming to the zoning district. The proposed northern parcel is <br />the half -acre minimum and would propose to meet all the zoning requirements. The proposed southern <br />parcel in the LR I district would be substandard in area so there still is not enough land to meet the LR <br />I zoning district. Planning Commission and Council would have to discuss if they are in support of a lot <br />area variance to create a new non -conforming lot. This one has the same engineer comments as before <br />including the discussion of connectivity and then County permitting requirements with access to <br />Shoreline. Are you comfortable with a proposal that includes variances to create a new non -conforming <br />lot? And then do you have concerns about any layout regarding Hennepin County and the engineers <br />comments for access? You are asked to discuss and provide feedback to the applicant. <br />Brett Larsen, 2040 Carmine Street and Mark Gronberg, Gronberg and Associates, Long Lake, appeared as <br />the applicants. <br />Mr. Larsen said he and his wife are building a home on the southern portion. On the northern portion <br />we've looked at a few different things. We've talked about a few different options, including putting <br />commercial on the northernmost part, and residential on the southernmost part. It is all buildable; there <br />are no wetland issues. After working through the options with Mark, it gets kind of tight when you're <br />trying to create an easement or a roadway between the two. So the plan would be to have one single <br />family home, one lot, one single family home on that lot. <br />Mr. Gronberg said they looked at putting a shared cul-de-sac with both properties but it takes up too much <br />area and the setbacks are onerous. We're certainly in favor of a shared access between the two properties <br />so that there's only one there. And I think like Bob said, right in, right out. It makes a lot of sense on a <br />busy road like that. A couple other things, looking at your 2030 land use plan, it shows that it's two to <br />three units per acre. So we're certainly in favor of doing a rezoning here to get that maybe before the <br />2030. But another thing I wanted to bring up is back a couple years ago we had a neck going up to a 25 <br />foot strip that went up to the north, just to make the dry land on that southerly lot over an acre. And then <br />the northerly lot was still 100 feet wide. It seems stupid to have a 2546ot strip up there that they could <br />never use, but it did technically meet the requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.