03-22-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

wati:k sTKUcruin-s ('oMMrni;i-:Mart’ll 1.1. plan and i n f orma- on water depths. Me noticed that the lot lines on the those on the plat are different and he would want more tion before maki':B a decision. Mauc said the Order issued in 1985 specifically stateil that the docks are to be configured as shown in the attached exhibit, the current licensed configuration. In response to questions from the executive director. V.art- man said most of the riparian lots have one l)oat each. To the best of his knowledge only one riparian owner has a boat on the multip1e dock. the out lot be ins a part of the by the 110 A raised a number of restrictions on each of the lots boats each 1whet lie r The existing situation of 2550’ of shoreline controlled questions. The MOA has certain abutting the MOA shoreline easement as to how many property owner is allowed. A question was raised as of the Mabcoc k to I.M(’I> i n s i / e P u I > I i i’ the 100’ setback from the westerly lot line was part original development approval l>y the City of Tonka Mav, favored a dock plan for the entire shoreline. Accordine Code any substantial change to a dock configuration, or or number of slips woul<l require a new license with a Mearinc. Grathwol would like to find a solution sa t i s 1 .ac t or lo as many people as possible. Babcock observed tlmt this i .s ;i c.ise where overlapping jurisdictions between the LMCD and a city couhl come into play. The applicant needs to meet the LMCD Code as well ns Tonka Bay city requirements. Reese and Grathwol suggested a Public Hearing. The I.MCI) Code does not require a Public Me a r i n e •. f the change i .s m i i.tii . In this case there is a question as to whether the new contiguia tion would meet that definition. Grathwol said he has auestions about the water depth, the effect the change would have on neigh boring properties and the drainage from the out lot. William Merriam. 25 Gideon’s Point, suggested the MOA come to agreement on the layiiut ol the docks, check with the < it> «»l Tonka Bay re compliance with its ordinances and a schematic prepared for all of the docks before any Public Hearine. Wartman proposed, in lieu of a Public Hearing, that new site plan with the MOA. inform the Citv of Tonka Haug. and reappear before the Water Structures Committee wo 1 said it would be in Wartman’s and the MOA’s best interest to have a Public Hearing. One can be scheduled at the April 10 Water Structures Committee meeting with a recommendation t «> the Board for its April 28 meeting. This could allow time lor dock installation in May. The executive director added that it aeree- ment can he reached with Haug and other objectors, a Hearing may not be required. Haug said he would want a Hearing as he is not the onl. person affected. MOTION: Reese moved. Raseop seconded, to require the Point Homeowners Association apply for a new dock 1 i ceri^se w, t h the appropriate fees for a Public Hearing to be held at the Aim iI 10. 1'1‘iT Water Structures ('ominittec meeting. Mr. Wartm.in i •• to advise the LMCD within a week if an agreement has otlieiwise levn he do a Bay and Gra t Il l'll hi i c pul* I i c G i lie on