Laserfiche WebLink
LMCI) HOARD or D!Ki:CTORS I’cbruary 2‘l, <br />i • <br />r.*i <br />V 4 <br />1 <br />ii <br />5. I^akesiiJc Marina, Maxwell Bay. Orono <br />Baf>cock explained the Committee recommendation that action <br />be taken recardiny Lakeside Marina’s advertisitic of unlicensed <br />off-lake storage for "unlimited in and out" launching. Ihc Hoard <br />received a co[)v of a letter, dated 2/19/93. from the executive <br />director to James Dunn. Lakeside Marina. Inc. The letter was <br />sent certified mail and there has been no resf)onse. <br />'I’he executive director explained that a year age the L'lCD <br />communicated with Dunn on a similar circumstance. The Lakeside <br />Marina grandfathered boat storage density does not allow these <br />additional boat storage facilities. The letter serves as notice <br />that if Lakeside continues to advertise it will be jeopardi7ine <br />its license. LeFevere added that while there is no evidence of a <br />violation at this time, the marina has not a[)plied for its luuj <br />license. When Lakeside does apply, he said, it might be appri)- <br />priate to put some additional reporting or e n f o r ceme r t - t v j>e <br />conditions oti the license alone the lines outlined in the .i/1'*/'.! <br />letter. If the marina does not meet those conditions it won hi be <br />additional grounds for suspension or revocation of the license. <br />Burr said Orono is aware of tlie issue. To dale Lakeside <br />Marina has not violated anything, so no action is necessary at <br />this time. The executive director said an Orono staff member <br />indicated the city is supportive of the LMCD actions. <br />Foster said he cannot understand why there cannot be strict <br />enforcement based on the advertisement. LeFevere said the Hoar<l <br />has a number of choices. 1) Criminal enforcement is usually <br />tried first because it is relativel” '•uick and less expensive. <br />2) Civil action can be taken, seeking a court order to brine the <br />Marina into compliance. 3) The Board could begin revocation pro­ <br />ceedings or susi>ension of the license. Revoking the license <br />would be the most effective as it would affect the grandfathered <br />status of the Marina. If they did not comply, a court order <br />would be needed to force them to cease operating. <br />Hurr explained the difficulty she and Thibault <br />last year in trying to determine if there was an off <br />violation at the marina. She said boat covers made <br />to see license numbers and without notice before hatui the <br />work was not available as to wh” the boats were there, i.e <br />experienced <br />lake storage <br />it il i f f i cu I f <br />pa pel <br />. for <br />sale, mechanical work or storage. Foster questioned giving <br />notice. LeFevere said Lakeside Marina does not have to provide <br />records, but that could be made part of licensing conditions set <br />by the Hoard. Foster said he would like to have staff pref».ire a <br />list of conditions to pul on the license when it comes up for <br />renewa1. <br />Johnstone asked what kind of test the Water Strueture ‘'om- <br />mittce uses in recommending license renewal. Hurr responded the <br />conditions under which a license is granted have to be met. <br />LeFevere explained that a renewal without change docs not lequire <br />hea r i nu of any k i nd . 1 he ap (> I i can l is en t i l I ed t o a I i ce*iise t o <br />extent as firevious yeais. unless conditions arc elianee'd. <br />low watei. The Hoard goes through the afM»rova( process <br />a <br />the same <br />such as