Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO ^.OUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD MARCH 22, 1993 <br />CDBG FUNDING - CONT. <br />Moorse explained with regard to access requirements, Orono Is in <br />complete compliance, and he assumed they comply with current <br />requirements of ADA, but noted those requirements are continually <br />changing. He said he would be attending a work session on such on <br />March 30th. <br />Kelley asked the criteria for use of the funds for sewer <br />connection. He asked the iixpected amount needed for each household, <br />and suggested any additional money be allocated to the social <br />services. <br />Mayor Callahan noted ^he County will select and qualify any <br />requests, and administer the funds. <br />Moorse stated Income guidelines are generally followed, and the <br />CouncM may wish to consider a first-come basis as there is a large <br />number jf households in the area that are expected to meet the <br />guideI Ines. <br />Gerhardsor noted the City will be required to pay the County to <br />administer such program on a per application basis. The County has <br />not yet determined that fee. He noted the City has 1 1/2 years to <br />use the funds. <br />Kelley asked if there was any money remaining from previous years <br />Qerhardson noted the rehabilitation program is an on-goIng basis. <br />In order to reallocate funding, the Council would need to hold <br />another public hearing. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to adopt the <br />resolution allocating $1,500 to each of the three service agencies <br />noted above, and the remainder of the grant to be used by the <br />Stubbs Bay residents for sewer connection costs, to be established <br />on a first-come basis, and the amount fK?t to exceed $1,500 per <br />househoid. <br />Gerhardscn questioned their ability to restrict the amount. <br />Moorse reiterated the funds would only be used for sewer connection <br />costs, and said the Council could allocate the amount with the <br />specifics decided upon at a future date. <br />Jabbour amended his motion, Kelley seconded, to remove the <br />restriction on the amount awarded each household. Ayes 4, nays 0.