My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord #237 - 3rd Ser/Granting a Nonexclusive Gas Franchise
Orono
>
Ordinances
>
Ord #237 - 3rd Ser/Granting a Nonexclusive Gas Franchise
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2020 11:59:00 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 10:25:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5.1. Indemnity of City. Company shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any <br /> and all liability, on account of injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by the <br /> construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Gas <br /> Facilities located in the Public Ways and Public Grounds. The City shall not be indemnified for losses <br /> or claims occasioned through its own negligence or otherwise wrongful act or omission except for <br /> losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or <br /> inspection of, Company's plans or work. <br /> 5.2. Defense of City. In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances <br /> where this agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the <br /> City in such suit if Notice thereof is promptly given to Company within a period wherein Company <br /> is not prejudiced by lack of such Notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will <br /> thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the <br /> consent of the City,which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third <br /> parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the City. The Company, in <br /> defending any action on behalf of the City, shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or <br /> immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. This Franchise agreement shall not be <br /> interpreted to constitute a waiver by the City of any of its defenses of immunity or limitations on <br /> liability under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. <br /> SECTION 6. VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS. <br /> The City shall give Company at least two (2) weeks prior written Notice of a proposed <br /> vacation of a Public Ways or Public Grounds. The City and the Company shall comply with City <br /> Code, Minnesota Statutes Section 160.29, Minnesota Rules 7819.3100 and Minnesota Rules <br /> 7819.3200 with respect to any request for vacation. <br /> SECTION 7. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. <br /> Any change in the form of government of the City shall not affect the validity of this <br /> Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding the City shall, without the consent of Company, <br /> succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the City provided in this Ordinance. <br /> SECTION 8. FRANCHISE FEE. <br /> 8.1. Form. During the term of the franchise hereby granted, the City may charge the <br /> Company a franchise fee. The franchise fee will be collected on a flat per meter basis, or by some <br /> other method that is mutually acceptable to both City and Company for each retail customer within <br /> the corporate limits of the City. The amount of the fee collected may differ for each customer class. <br /> The City will use a formula that provides a stable and predictable amount of fees,without placing the <br /> Company at a competitive disadvantage. Such fee shall not exceed any amount that the Company <br /> may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City and be consistent with the Minnesota <br /> Public Utility Commission's March 23, 2011 Order establishing franchise fee filing requirements <br /> in Docket No. E,G999/CI-09-970. If the Company claims that the City required fee formula is <br /> discriminatory or otherwise places the Company at a competitive disadvantage, the Company will <br /> provide a formula that will produce a substantially similar fee amount to the City. If the City and <br /> Model Franchise Ordinance-CenterPoint Energy <br /> Page 1 1 <br /> I:\Legal\Franchise\Franchise Manual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.