Laserfiche WebLink
N <br />• > <br />Plan B {I^eview Hxhibit B) Section 10.28. Subd. 5(B). <br />A. Front/Slreet Setback <br />Required = 50’ <br />Proposed = 46 ’ <br />Variance = 4’ or 4% <br />V ' <br />U.Side setback. <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Variance <br />30’ <br />20’ <br />10’ or 33.3% <br />Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L-1) Hardcover within 0-75’ <br />C. Setback area = 16,200 s.f. <br />Allowed = 0 <br />Proposed = 275 s.f. or 1.7% <br />D.Setback from I rioutarv' <br />Required = 75’ <br />Proposed = 67 ’ <br />Variance = 8’ or 10.6% <br />Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L-2) <br />E. Hardcover within 75-250’ setback area <br />Total area = 16,200 s.f. <br />Allowed = 0 <br />Proposed = 4,310 s.f. or 30.37% <br />In Plan B, structure still encroaches the 75’ setback, at the closest projection 67 . <br />1.7% of hardcover improvements are located within the 0-75’. House still is <br />shown at the 20’ side setback but is now 10’ further away from roadway <br />consistent with the street alignment of the house to the immediate south at 46 ’. <br />Applicant claims drainage pattern is environmentally sounder as greater runoff <br />.fom hardcover improvements are directed towards 250-500 setback area to the <br />northwest. Refer to E.\hibit E. <br />Council Action <br />To provide staff with conceptual direction so that an appropriate resolution can be <br />presented for Council’s formal action at their March 22nd meeting. <br />ch