My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
03-08-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 10:01:38 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 9:57:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />February 4, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />the driveway needs to be considered, to ensure emergency services can <br />be adequately provided. Chubb insurance Company insures our home. <br />They informed me that if we were to have a structure fire at our home, <br />15,800 gallons of water would be needed to extinguish the tire. <br />Wayzata is the responding fire department and can only bring 1,750 <br />gallons on 2 pumper trucks. Since the hydrant is 3,200 feet from our <br />home, Wayzata could not pump directly. In addition, they do not have <br />tanker trucks to set up a relay system. Upon confirmation of a structure <br />fire, mutual aid would be summoned. Long Lake would respond first with <br />2 tank trucks (2,300 and 1,850 gallons) and a 1,000 gallon pumper <br />truck. It would take about 13 minutes for Long Lake trucks to reach our <br />residence. Additional tank trucks would be needed from Maple Plain or <br />Minnetonka. Easy access can be critical in such a situation. <br />In summary, with only the Pruddens & McNellises using the driveway, the <br />driveway is adequate for such low traffic. By adding another family, guests, <br />more delivery trucks, etc., given the weatfier conditions that are guaranteed <br />each Minnesota winter, anu with the potential for emergency vehicles <br />needing access, a very real problem exists. <br />We believe that a fair and common sense answer to this subdivision request <br />should include the following ideas and specifications: <br />1. To require Woodhill Country Club to rebuild Part A of the driveway to an <br />adequate width and to 7-ton capacity. At the curve, design should <br />include an innovative way to park vehicles, if they become otuck, so that <br />the driveway could stay open for other traffic or emergency vehicles. <br />The design should leave all major trees and a vegetation barrier to the <br />Carpenter property. Part A should be raised and drains placed under the <br />driveway so that the water run-off can drain to the wetland area. The <br />crains should be placed so that Lhe increased run-off that will oe caused <br />by the increased hardcover of the proposed residence will drain. <br />2. At some time in the future, if the Prudden property is subdivided, the <br />logical place for a cul-de-sac would be at the end of the road, which <br />would place it at the top of the hill on the Prudden property. This should <br />be specified. <br />3. Assuming that the driveway entrance to 200 Woodhill Road would be <br />from Part B of the driveway, it would go over the gutter that currently
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.