My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
02-08-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2024 1:10:48 PM
Creation date
2/12/2024 1:06:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
424
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 <br />ZONING FILES #1778/#1779 - CONT. <br />2. The applicants want a guarantee that If In the future <br />there are changes In zoning or land use applicable to <br />tnis property, the special lot combination agreement <br />would remain In force. Moorse stated language can be <br />drafted acceptable to both the applicants and the City. <br />Jabbour felt the Goettens should be allowed use of the riparian <br />out lot as lo>?g as al I subject property is held in common ownership. <br />He felt it would be unreasonable for the City to force the Goettens <br />to sell the vacant lot so a residence could be built and the outlot <br />used. <br />Mayor Callahan inqui'*ed as to the normal policy on this Issue. <br />Mabusth stated the common ownership of the lots makes the request <br />reasonabIe. <br />It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to direct <br />staff to redraft the appropriate resolution and special lot <br />comb InatIon for AppI I cations #1778 & #1779 for Andrew Goetten, 1385 <br />Fox Street, clarifying the riparian rights issue and guaranteeing <br />future rights of the property, subject to the City Attorney’s <br />review and approval. Ayes 3, nays 0. <br />(#5) #1787 ROBERT L. WAADE, <br />996 WILDHURST TRAIL - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3228 <br />Mr. & Mrs. Robert Waade were present. <br />Mabusth explained this Is a request for a conditional use permit <br />for a non-rental guest apartment. The Planning Commission was <br />concerned that access to the apartment did not meet the standard <br />for access, which must be through the principal structure. The <br />applicants, at that meeting, agreed to relocate a wall making the <br />entrance within the principal structure. She felt the Planning <br />Commission was also concerned with the size and the kitchen within <br />the apartment. She noted the Planning Commission recommended a <br />condition to limit approval to the current owner, requiring any <br />future owner to appear before the Council for approval to continue <br />use or remove the kitchen area. <br />Mr. Waade noted he has built many homes with this type of apartment <br />and has never been asked to limit approval to current owners.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).