Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1993 <br />ZONING FILES #1768/#1786 - CONT. <br />Mayor Callahan understood there Is a large volume of traffic on the <br />property. <br />Toenges clarified that the appiicants do entertain frequentiy and <br />Dr. 0mlie must have easy access from the property in the case of <br />an emergency. <br />Jabbour felt the Island may create more of a hardship in <br />maneuvering the driveway. <br />Kelley stated this is a classic example of overbuilding on a lot. <br />He noted they proposed five garages, and suggested that one be <br />eliminated. He said planning for this property should have been <br />done prior to application for the permit. <br />Jabbour noted It is up to the appiicants to demonstrate a hardship <br />for the granting of the variance. He felt the applicants created <br />the hardship. <br />Toenges stated the hardship has always existed with the access onto <br />the County Road. <br />Mayor Callahan suggested the family is too large for the lot <br />Larson indicated a portion of the ha'^dcover percentage is landscape <br />areas underlain with fabric. He added, the retaining wall and <br />slopage benefits the tower area and the lake by slowing erosion. <br />Mabusth noted staff issued the building permit and later realized <br />the need for steps which had not been included, which increased the <br />approved hardcover by .2%. <br />Goetten stated the applicants have made a good faith effort to <br />reduce their proposal. She reiterated a turnaround drive is safer <br />for access. She noted there is no Increase In the 250-500’ <br />hardcover. She inquired whether the fabric under the landscape <br />areas could be removed. <br />Larson stated that could be eliminated which would reduce the <br />hardcover by approximately 250 s.f. <br />Jabbour reiterated his approval of the original driveway design <br />approved with the building permit, and felt, if the application is <br />approved as proposed, would set a negative precedent. Ke felt the <br />project is 100X aesthetic and OX safety.