My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
02-08-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2024 1:10:48 PM
Creation date
2/12/2024 1:06:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
424
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
January 6, 1992 0 A¥ 'e 1993 <br />Orono Planning Commission & Council <br />City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, NN 55323 <br />Dear Members: <br />I have owned this lot for 34 years and wish to construct a house <br />on jt. Prior to the new shoreland regulations of a year ago the <br />setback from the pond was 26 feet and there was adeguate room to <br />build. This lot was not originally designed with a 75 foot <br />setback in mind. Due to the meandering creek the 75 foot setback <br />can not be met. The proposed setbacks as shown on the site plan <br />are comparable to the adjoining structures. One could qtiestion <br />whether the setback should even be measured from the edge of the <br />pond since the homeowners are responsible for the existence and <br />maintenance of the dam and the centerline of the original creek <br />is much farther away. <br />I have looked at moving closer to Leaf Street but in prior <br />meetings wi*h the council a 25 foot road easement was agreed upon <br />since no road easement presently exists. This already brings <br />me 0 feet closer than in other places on Leaf Street which have <br />a 33 foot easement. Even though Leaf Street is being <br />reconstructed to its original narrow width at this time, there is <br />a good possibility that it could be widened in the future causing <br />the hoLtse to be even closer to the road. <br />Concerning drainage and runoff into the pond, there is less <br />direct runoff from the proposed house since more runoff would be <br />running west first and taking a longer route through grass areas <br />to eventually reach the creek. Also, the area in front of the <br />dam is a very large sediment basin anyway. <br />This proposed house fits in well with the existing contours so <br />that very little grading outside of the foundation is necessary. <br />The adjoining lots have garage and sheds much closer to the pond <br />than this proposal and the setbacks being proposed are certainly <br />well in line with the neighborhood considering the unique <br />topographic features and creek location on this lot. <br />Sincerely, <br />Donald R. Gronbern
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.