Laserfiche WebLink
December 20. 1991 <br />2.LOT AREA <br />No flexibility is sought for property on Lake Minnetonka v^r General Development Lakes. <br />The. City substantially exceeds the requirement for these lakes. Some decrease in lot area is <br />sought for duplex and multi family units on Recreational Development Lakes and Natural <br />Environment Lakes in certain categories. <br />NATURAL E.W1RONMENT <br />LAKE <br />RECREATIONAL <br />DEVELOPMENT LAKE <br />CE.NERAL <br />DEVELOPMENT LAKE <br />DNR STANDARD <br />Ripiriin 40,000 ’ t.f., 70.000' dup., <br />lOO.'JOO ’tri.. 130,000-quad. <br />20.000 ’ i.f.. 35,000 ’dup. <br />50,000 ’ in.. 65.000 ’ quad. <br />15.00:’ I.f.. 26,000* dup., <br />35,000 ’ Iri., 49.000 ’ quad. <br />Nonripariin 20,000 ’ f.r. 35.000 ’ dup.. <br />52.000 ’ ui.. 65.000' quad. <br />15.000 ’ I.f. 26,000 ’ dup.. <br />38,000 ’ Iri., 49.<XX»’ quad. <br />lu.OOO’ a.f.. 17.500' dup., <br />25.000 ’ Iri.. 32.500 ’ quad. <br />VICTORIA EXISTING <br />Ripanin <br />Noftripahao <br />43.560 sq. ft. <br />20.000 s. ft. <br />43.560 sq. ft. <br />15.000 sq. ft. <br />40,000 sq. ft. <br />40,000 sq. ft. (gross density) <br />21,7S0 sq. ft. (net densjty)^ <br />VICTORIA PROPOSAL <br />RipifUn <br />a <br />43,560* s f.. 43.560’ dup.. <br />N/A in., N/A quad, (aubject <br />to reduclion for park <br />dedication) <br />43.560* t.f., 43,560’ dup., <br />N/A tri., N/A quad, (subject <br />to reduction for park <br />dedication) <br />40,000* i.f., N/A dup., N/A <br />tri., N/A quad, (subject <br />to reduction for park <br />dedication) <br />20,000* f.f., 20,000 ’ dup., <br />3.600/d.u. tri. and qued. <br />15.000 ’ , f.. 15,000' dup., <br />3,000/d.u. tri.and quad. <br />40.000- a.f.. N/A dup., <br />3,000/d.u. Iri. and quad. <br />•Nfl 4*a.ntv it deCncd in zoninf oidintoet tt *Th* dtotiiy in toy of th* ftiUicatkl dldncU. e»Jfti!ifed by taking th* lotai land area <br />coraainad n tt.e njbdivmon. minui the loul land area aUoeaud to pubife open ipaei required by ihit Chapter, e.id dividing the rctuli by the <br />numbtr of firmly dwtilinfs lociud or U> b« lociUd id ihll Hibdiviiiore.* <br />RATIONAL. AND JUSTIFICATION Essentially: historical reasons, sound suburban <br />planning/design, reasons associated with urban improvements (streets, utilities) and cost <br />efficiency in subdividing property to meet market needs. Reductions in the lot area arc <br />proposed if property is dedicated consistent with the comprehensive plan. For example, <br />establishment of the Lakes and Greenways Circles including the trail system.